Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add seranking-planable/smm-skills --skill site-audit-to-social-distributiongit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/seranking-planable/smm-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/seranking-planable/smm-skills/site-audit-to-social-distribution)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/seranking-planable/smm-skills/site-audit-to-social-distribution"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/seranking-planable/smm-skills/site-audit-to-social-distribution/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/seranking-planable/smm-skills/site-audit-to-social-distribution"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/seranking-planable/smm-skills/site-audit-to-social-distribution.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00158 | $0.02288 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00079 | $0.01144 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00032 | $0.00458 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00016 | $0.00229 |
Grade A, and why
site-audit-to-social-distribution scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to site-audit-to-social-distribution — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 106 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Site audit → coordinated rewrite + social distribution
Close the loop between finding SEO problems (SE Ranking) and fixing and promoting them (Planable). Planable's Universal content pages hold the rewritten page copy so it can be reviewed with comments and formally approved before anyone publishes it to the site; the social layer schedules posts that distribute the refreshed page.
Prerequisites
- SE Ranking MCP connected (a project enables repeatable audits + competitive context; one-off audits work without one).
- Planable MCP connected, with a Universal content page for the page-copy review and social pages for distribution. Pages are added inside Planable — they can't be created via the connector.
- These two may live in different workspaces (e.g. a "Universal pages" workspace for page copy and a brand workspace for social). That's fine — run the rewrite in whichever workspace has the Universal page, and the distribution in whichever has the connected social pages. Confirm both up front with
list_pages; if the Universal page is missing, ask the user to add one.
- These two may live in different workspaces (e.g. a "Universal pages" workspace for page copy and a brand workspace for social). That's fine — run the rewrite in whichever workspace has the Universal page, and the distribution in whichever has the connected social pages. Confirm both up front with
Connector health check
Before doing anything else, verify both MCPs are reachable:
- SE Ranking: call
DATA_getSubscription. If it fails or returns an auth error, stop immediately and tell the user:"The SE Ranking connector isn't responding — please reconnect it before we continue. Setup guide: https://seranking.com/api/integrations/mcp/"
- Planable: call
list_workspaces. If it fails or returns an auth error, stop immediately and tell the user:"The Planable connector isn't responding — please reconnect it before we continue. Setup guide: https://help.planable.io/hc/en-us/articles/27538577098780-How-to-connect-Planable-MCP-to-your-AI-tools"
Only continue to the process steps below once both calls return a successful response.
Process
1. Get the audit — reuse before you crawl
A full crawl is slow and consumes plan crawl budget, so check for an existing audit first:
PROJECT_listAudits(orDATA_listAudits) — if a recent finished audit exists for the domain, reuse it; read it withPROJECT_getAuditReport/DATA_getAuditReport(audit_id). Note the audit date and tell the user how fresh it is — offer to re-run if it's stale (more than a month or two old).- Only if none exists (or the user wants fresh data):
PROJECT_createAudit(domain, settings?)→ poll readiness →getAuditReport. Without a project, useDATA_createStandardAudit(orcreateAdvancedAudit). Scopemax_pagessensibly for large sites.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 106 lines · 158 tokens per session scan A 1a51d8066a25
site-audit-to-social-distribution is a skill published in the GitHub repository seranking-planable/smm-skills (3 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 158 tokens to every session and 2,288 once invoked, about $0.0008 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to site-audit-to-social-distribution, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
analytics-strategy
Design measurement frameworks including event taxonomy, KPI hierarchy, dashboard architecture, attribution models, and analytics implementation strategy. Use this skill whenever the user wants to plan analytics, design dashboards, build event taxonomies, define KPIs, set up tracking, or audit existing measurement.…
content-strategy
Develop a content strategy covering editorial positioning, content pillars, formats, calendar, governance, and topical authority planning. Use this skill whenever the user wants to plan a content program, define content pillars, build an editorial calendar, structure topic clusters, set up content governance, or align…
incident-response
Manage active production incidents through detection, triage, mitigation, communication, and resolution with structured roles and decision-making. Use this skill whenever the user has an active incident, a production issue, a service outage, a security incident, or needs to plan incident response procedures. Triggers…
stakeholder-communication
Communicate effectively with stakeholders across functions and seniority levels. Use this skill when writing status updates, preparing executive reviews, sharing technical decisions with non-technical audiences, managing up, communicating bad news, or designing the communication cadence for a project. Triggers on…
agb-begriff-vorformuliert-305
Für AGB Begriff Vorformuliert 305: ordnet Norm, Beweislast und Gegenargument; Ergebnis: Prüfprodukt mit Risiko und nächstem Schritt. Fachgebiet: AGB-Recht-Prüfer. Route: agb-begriff-vorformuliert-305.
blue-pencil-board-agb-bonitaetspruefung-bonus
Für Blue Pencil und Geltungserhaltende Reduktion: ordnet Norm, Beweislast und Gegenargument; Ergebnis: Tatbestands- oder Anspruchsmatrix.