Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add seranking/seo-skills --skill seo-competitor-gap-analysisgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/seranking/seo-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/seranking/seo-skills/seo-competitor-gap-analysis)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/seranking/seo-skills/seo-competitor-gap-analysis"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/seranking/seo-skills/seo-competitor-gap-analysis/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/seranking/seo-skills/seo-competitor-gap-analysis"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/seranking/seo-skills/seo-competitor-gap-analysis.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00075 | $0.01501 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00037 | $0.00750 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00300 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00150 |
Grade A, and why
seo-competitor-gap-analysis scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 122 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Example output: examples/seo-competitor-gap-analysis-wix-com-20260514/REPORT.md
Competitor Gap Analysis
Identify the specific keywords your competitors rank for in the top 20 that your domain does not, ranked by commercial value and realistic capture difficulty.
Prerequisites
- SE Ranking MCP server connected.
- User provides: (a) target domain, (b) 3 to 5 competitor domains (or ask the skill to auto-discover them), (c) market country (default:
us), and optionally filters (min volume, max KD, intent).
Process
-
Validate or discover competitors
DATA_getDomainCompetitors- If the user did not provide competitors, pull the top 5 organic competitors for the target in the target market.
- Surface the list to the user and ask them to confirm or override before proceeding.
- Note: the upstream API does not support
limit/offset, so this call returns the full set (~60KB for popular domains) and the MCP harness writes it to a file. Read that file path, parse the{data: [...]}JSON, sort bycommon_keywordsdesc, and take the top 5.
-
Pull competitor keyword sets
DATA_getDomainKeywords- For each competitor, pull keywords where they rank in the top 20 of the target country.
- Save per-competitor lists.
-
Pull target keyword set
DATA_getDomainKeywords- For the target domain, pull all ranking keywords in the target country (any position).
- This is the exclusion set.
-
Compute the gap
DATA_getDomainKeywordsComparison(cross-check)- Keywords ranked by at least one competitor in the top 20 but not ranked by the target domain at all.
- Use the comparison endpoint as a cross-check.
-
Filter and segment
- Apply user-specified filters on volume, KD, and intent.
- Segment by intent: informational, commercial, transactional, navigational.
- Segment by competition: how many of the N competitors rank for each gap keyword.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 122 lines · 75 tokens per session scan A 1783fb7af4d8
seo-competitor-gap-analysis is a skill published in the GitHub repository seranking/seo-skills (139 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 75 tokens to every session and 1,501 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
content-strategy
Develop a content strategy covering editorial positioning, content pillars, formats, calendar, governance, and topical authority planning. Use this skill whenever the user wants to plan a content program, define content pillars, build an editorial calendar, structure topic clusters, set up content governance, or align…
stakeholder-communication
Communicate effectively with stakeholders across functions and seniority levels. Use this skill when writing status updates, preparing executive reviews, sharing technical decisions with non-technical audiences, managing up, communicating bad news, or designing the communication cadence for a project. Triggers on…
analytics-strategy
Design measurement frameworks including event taxonomy, KPI hierarchy, dashboard architecture, attribution models, and analytics implementation strategy. Use this skill whenever the user wants to plan analytics, design dashboards, build event taxonomies, define KPIs, set up tracking, or audit existing measurement.…
incident-response
Manage active production incidents through detection, triage, mitigation, communication, and resolution with structured roles and decision-making. Use this skill whenever the user has an active incident, a production issue, a service outage, a security incident, or needs to plan incident response procedures. Triggers…
review-work
Post-implementation gate review: run manual QA on the real surface yourself, then launch ONE gate reviewer (never a panel) to audit goal, constraints, code quality, security, missed context, and QA evidence. Use before a PR handoff or when the user explicitly asks to review completed work.
agb-begriff-vorformuliert-305
Für AGB Begriff Vorformuliert 305: ordnet Norm, Beweislast und Gegenargument; Ergebnis: Prüfprodukt mit Risiko und nächstem Schritt. Fachgebiet: AGB-Recht-Prüfer. Route: agb-begriff-vorformuliert-305.