Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add seranking/seo-skills --skill seo-technical-auditgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/seranking/seo-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/seranking/seo-skills/seo-technical-audit)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/seranking/seo-skills/seo-technical-audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/seranking/seo-skills/seo-technical-audit/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/seranking/seo-skills/seo-technical-audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/seranking/seo-skills/seo-technical-audit.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00109 | $0.04693 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00055 | $0.02346 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00022 | $0.00939 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00469 |
Grade A, and why
seo-technical-audit scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 241 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Example output: examples/seo-technical-audit-linear-app-20260514/TECH-AUDIT.md
Technical Audit
A one-shot technical SEO audit for a domain. Pulls SE Ranking's audit data, categorizes findings by area (crawlability, indexability, security, mobile, structured data, etc.), severity-sorts within each, and produces a top-10 fix list ranked by impact × effort.
Prerequisites
- SE Ranking MCP server connected.
- Claude's
WebFetchtool available (used for sense-checking robots.txt and sitemap presence). - User provides: a target domain (e.g.
example.com). Optional: target country (defaultus), audit-page-limit override (default: rely on the existing audit's limit).
Process
-
Validate target & preflight. See
skills/seo-firecrawl/references/preflight.mdfor the canonical 3-stage preflight (credit balance, Firecrawl availability, Google APIs). Skill-specific notes:- Normalise domain (strip protocol, trailing slash) before continuing.
- Estimated SE Ranking cost for this skill: a re-check of an existing audit is cheap; creating a new audit is significantly more expensive and varies by page count. Surface the cost before deciding.
- Firecrawl: optional. When available, step 8 (Modern signals checklist) runs on 5 sample URLs and
/robots.txt, ~6 Firecrawl credits (hard cap). Without it, step 8 is skipped — JS-render canonical/noindex divergence, X-Robots-Tag headers, and AI-crawler robots-rule analysis are unavailable but the full technical-audit deliverable still ships. Pass--no-firecrawlto skip step 8 even when Firecrawl is available (saves credits). - Google APIs: tier 0 unlocks step 8b (CrUX field data); tier 1 also unlocks step 8c (per-URL GSC Inspection on top 5 traffic pages). See
skills/seo-google/references/cross-skill-integration.md§ "seo-technical-audit" for the full recipe and per-tier branches.
-
Find or create the audit
DATA_listAudits- List audits for the domain.
- If a recent audit exists (<30 days old), use it.
- If older than 30 days, run
DATA_recheckAuditto refresh. - If none exists, ask the user before creating a new one with
DATA_createStandardAudit(it consumes credits). - Wait for
DATA_getAuditStatusto reportdonebefore pulling the report.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 241 lines · 109 tokens per session scan A 59fbd07ad075
seo-technical-audit is a skill published in the GitHub repository seranking/seo-skills (139 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 109 tokens to every session and 4,693 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
content-strategy
Develop a content strategy covering editorial positioning, content pillars, formats, calendar, governance, and topical authority planning. Use this skill whenever the user wants to plan a content program, define content pillars, build an editorial calendar, structure topic clusters, set up content governance, or align…
stakeholder-communication
Communicate effectively with stakeholders across functions and seniority levels. Use this skill when writing status updates, preparing executive reviews, sharing technical decisions with non-technical audiences, managing up, communicating bad news, or designing the communication cadence for a project. Triggers on…
analytics-strategy
Design measurement frameworks including event taxonomy, KPI hierarchy, dashboard architecture, attribution models, and analytics implementation strategy. Use this skill whenever the user wants to plan analytics, design dashboards, build event taxonomies, define KPIs, set up tracking, or audit existing measurement.…
incident-response
Manage active production incidents through detection, triage, mitigation, communication, and resolution with structured roles and decision-making. Use this skill whenever the user has an active incident, a production issue, a service outage, a security incident, or needs to plan incident response procedures. Triggers…
review-work
Post-implementation gate review: run manual QA on the real surface yourself, then launch ONE gate reviewer (never a panel) to audit goal, constraints, code quality, security, missed context, and QA evidence. Use before a PR handoff or when the user explicitly asks to review completed work.
agb-begriff-vorformuliert-305
Für AGB Begriff Vorformuliert 305: ordnet Norm, Beweislast und Gegenargument; Ergebnis: Prüfprodukt mit Risiko und nächstem Schritt. Fachgebiet: AGB-Recht-Prüfer. Route: agb-begriff-vorformuliert-305.