Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add shabaraba/vibing.nvim --skill test-designgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/shabaraba/vibing.nvimWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/shabaraba/vibing.nvim/test-design)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/shabaraba/vibing.nvim/test-design"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/shabaraba/vibing.nvim/test-design/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/shabaraba/vibing.nvim/test-design"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/shabaraba/vibing.nvim/test-design.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00082 | $0.01188 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00033 | $0.00475 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00016 | $0.00238 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00119 |
Grade A, and why
test-design scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 205 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Test Design for vibing.nvim
Generate comprehensive E2E test scenarios after implementing new features.
Usage
Provide context when invoking:
/test-design
I implemented [feature description].
Changed files:
- [list of new/modified files]
Existing tests:
- [list of existing test files]
Example:
/test-design
I implemented a new slash command `/export` that exports chat history to Markdown.
Changed files:
- lua/vibing/application/chat/slash_commands.lua (added export_command)
- lua/vibing/utils/markdown_exporter.lua (new file)
Existing tests:
- tests/e2e/chat_basic_flow_spec.lua (basic chat operations)
Output Format
1. Test Scenario Analysis
Categorized scenarios with checkboxes:
- Happy Path ✅ - Most common use cases
- Error Cases ❌ - Error handling (validation, network, permissions)
- Edge Cases 🔸 - Boundary conditions, special characters, timeouts
- Integration Points 🔗 - Interactions with other features
2. Priority Ranking
- Critical: Core functionality - must work for release
- High: Error handling - security, data loss prevention
- Medium: Usability - edge cases, user experience
- Low: Performance - optimization, rare scenarios
3. Test Code Templates
Ready-to-implement code using e2e_helper.lua:
describe("E2E: [Feature Name]", function()
local nvim_instance
before_each(function()
nvim_instance = helper.spawn_nvim_instance({
headless = true,
init_script = "tests/minimal_init.lua",
})
end)
after_each(function()
helper.cleanup_instance(nvim_instance)
end)
-- Test cases with appropriate TIMEOUTS constants
end)
Workflow
- Gather context - Read changed files, analyze scope, review existing tests
- Design scenarios - Generate Happy/Error/Edge/Integration cases
- Prioritize - Rank by Critical/High/Medium/Low
- Generate code - Create implementation-ready test templates
Example Output
For a /export command that exports chat to Markdown:
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 205 lines · 82 tokens per session scan A 8534bbeed47a
test-design is a skill published in the GitHub repository shabaraba/vibing.nvim (13 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 82 tokens to every session and 1,188 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
agent-e2e-test-specialist
Specialist subagent: Playwright, Cypress, and visual regression testing specialist. Use only when the user explicitly asks for E2E tests, browser test automation, or visual regression testing. Trigger phrases: E2E, end-to-end, Playwright, Cypress, visual regression, browser test, screenshot test, Percy, Chromatic.
api-integration-test
Create, maintain, and run gated Go integration tests for internal APIs and service-to-service clients (HTTP/gRPC). Use for endpoint verification, contract checks with real runtime config, opt-in execution, timeout/retry safety, and integration failure triage in Go services.
e2e-test
Design, maintain, and execute reliable end-to-end tests for critical user journeys with Agent Browser as first choice for exploration and Playwright as the preferred code path for suites and CI. Use for E2E strategy, journey coverage, flaky test triage, artifact collection, CI gating, regression prevention, and…
browser-testing
Methodology for writing and maintaining DorkOS browser tests. Use when writing, running, debugging, or maintaining Playwright browser tests in apps/e2e, when deciding between a browser test and a unit test, or when e2e behavior needs verification.
qa-e2e
End-to-end tests with Playwright or Cypress. Trigger when the user wants to create user journey tests, UI integration tests, or browser automation.
qa-chrome
Visual tests and browser debugging via Chrome. Use to test web pages, verify visual rendering, debug with the console, or automate browser actions. Trigger when the user mentions "visual test", "Chrome", "browser", "browser console", "DOM", "screenshot", "GIF".