Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add ShaishavMaisuria/research-paper-lifecycle-skills --skill draft-related-workgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ShaishavMaisuria/research-paper-lifecycle-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/shaishavmaisuria/research-paper-lifecycle-skills/draft-related-work)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/shaishavmaisuria/research-paper-lifecycle-skills/draft-related-work"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/shaishavmaisuria/research-paper-lifecycle-skills/draft-related-work/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/shaishavmaisuria/research-paper-lifecycle-skills/draft-related-work"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/shaishavmaisuria/research-paper-lifecycle-skills/draft-related-work.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00205 | $0.03313 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00102 | $0.01656 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00041 | $0.00663 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00020 | $0.00331 |
Grade A, and why
draft-related-work scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 245 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Draft Related Work
Produces a Related Work section that positions the paper — every paragraph is a cluster of actually-retrieved prior work plus an explicit delta sentence — formatted to the target venue's conventions. This is a writing skill with two hard gates:
- Anti-hallucination. A citation that was not retrieved and verified in this session does not ship.
- Anti-structural-hole. The clusters the section MUST cover are derived
from the paper's own claimed scope, never from whatever
find-papershappened to return. A retrieved-but-peripheral corpus produces an outline that positions confidently while leaving a hole exactly where the paper lives — a missing direct-competitor cluster, an absent canonical lineage, a whole expected sub-area with zero citations. That gap is found deterministically and routed back tofind-papersas a targeted second pass, not shipped as a silent author to-do.
When to use
- Drafting Related Work for a new paper, given a topic and a target venue.
- Rewriting an existing section reviewers called a "laundry list", "thin", "missing comparisons", or "unclear novelty".
- Folding newly found papers (or a reviewer's "you missed X, Y, Z") into an existing section without breaking its structure.
- NOT for finding papers (use
find-papers), reading one paper (fetch-paper), a full thematic survey (literature-review), or checking an existing bibliography only (verify-citations).
Inputs
- The paper's core claim/contributions, AND its sub-tasks/requirements (from the draft's intro/abstract, or ask). These drive the required-cluster enumeration in step 2 — without them the section can only mirror the retrieved pile.
- Target venue — a
venues/conferences/<id>.ymlprofile if one exists (itsexemplar_distributioncalibrates the section's length/breadth). - Candidate prior work: output of
find-papers/literature-review, the draft's.bib, and/or papers the user names. CONTACT_EMAILenv var for the metadata script (prompts if unset).
What ships with it
6 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 245 lines · 205 tokens per session scan A becbca5b0b66
draft-related-work is a skill published in the GitHub repository ShaishavMaisuria/research-paper-lifecycle-skills (42 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 205 tokens to every session and 3,313 once invoked, about $0.0010 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
aaai-reproducibility
Use when strengthening an AAAI paper's reproducibility checklist (placed after references), experimental traceability, seed and hyperparameter reporting, compute and cost disclosure, dataset access and licensing, code/data ZIP readiness, and the claim-to-evidence map that Phase-1 reviewers use to judge rigor across…
aaai-submission
Use when auditing an AAAI main technical track submission for OpenReview readiness, double-blind anonymity, page limits, reproducibility checklist, supplementary material, author limits, multiple-submission policy, and AAAI AI-use policy compliance.
acl-author-response
Use when drafting an ACL author response inside an ACL Rolling Review cycle on OpenReview, covering the response window before meta-review, reviewer discussion dynamics, score-change strategy, flagging review issues to the area chair, anonymity rules, and deciding between responding now versus revising for a later ARR…
acl-camera-ready
Use when preparing an accepted ACL main-conference or Findings paper for camera-ready, covering the extra content page, de-anonymization and acknowledgements, AI-assistance disclosure, keeping the Limitations section, ACL Anthology metadata and CC BY 4.0 publication, meta-review-driven edits, and presentation-mode…
acl-related-work
Use when positioning an ACL submission against the NLP literature, covering ACL Anthology citation practice, arXiv-versus-published version citation, concurrent LLM-era preprints, prior-cycle ARR resubmission overlap, anonymity-preserving self-citation, and the fast-moving baseline problem in computational linguistics.
acl-reproducibility
Use when strengthening reproducibility evidence for an ACL paper reviewed through ACL Rolling Review, covering the Responsible NLP checklist end to end, hyperparameter and compute reporting, prompt and decoding disclosure for LLM experiments, data contamination auditing, variance across runs, and checklist-to-paper…