Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ShaishavMaisuria/research-paper-lifecycle-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/plugins/shaishavmaisuria/research-paper-lifecycle-skills/paper-writing)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/plugins/shaishavmaisuria/research-paper-lifecycle-skills/paper-writing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/plugins/shaishavmaisuria/research-paper-lifecycle-skills/paper-writing/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/plugins/shaishavmaisuria/research-paper-lifecycle-skills/paper-writing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/plugins/shaishavmaisuria/research-paper-lifecycle-skills/paper-writing.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>Grade A, and why
paper-writing scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
{
"name": "paper-writing",
"source": "./",
"description": "Venue-aware academic writing: reflection passes, abstracts, related work, literature reviews, prose polish, and author/venue style matching grounded in verified citations.",
"version": "0.1.0",
"license": "Apache-2.0",
"keywords": [
"academic-writing",
"abstract",
"latex",
"literature-review",
"style"
],
"skills": [
"./skills/reflect-paper",
"./skills/write-abstract",
"./skills/literature-review",
"./skills/draft-related-work",
"./skills/polish-prose",
"./skills/match-style",
"./skills/polish-tables-figures"
]
}What it installs
The manifest is a name and a version. 7 skills travel with it, and installing the plugin installs all of them — 1,288 tokens a session between them. Each is measured on its own page, and each can be installed alone.
What ships with it
1 file beside marketplace.json#paper-writing in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 23 lines scan A b742cf17c8f4
paper-writing is a plugin published in the GitHub repository ShaishavMaisuria/research-paper-lifecycle-skills (55 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. Its token cost is not measured: this kind of file is read by the harness, not the model. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other plugins, from other repositories
co-researcher
Academic research plugin for Claude Code: literature reviews, systematic reviews, peer review and citation checking, with every citation verified against OpenAlex, arXiv and Europe PMC.
co-researcher
Academic research extension for Gemini CLI: literature reviews, systematic reviews, peer review and citation checking, with every citation verified against OpenAlex, arXiv and Europe PMC.
paperjury
Pre-submission AI review and editing for CS-conference papers: direct-edit LaTeX or Markdown (Word via one-time extraction), run an adversarial multi-agent courtroom review with consensus-gated revisions, or run it unattended toward a goal.
medsci-modeling
Clinical AI model research engineering: choose a paper-grounded architecture, scaffold a reproducible PyTorch training repo, validate the model's split and validation design, document it (Model Card / Datasheet), and evaluate models or LLMs/MLLMs on clinical tasks. Integrates MONAI / nnU-Net, never replaces them.
medsci-data
Study design and validity review, literature-grounded variable operationalization, sample-size planning, data cleaning, de-identification, codebook generation, and dataset versioning.
rigorous-paper-reviewer
Deep 7-pass technical review of LaTeX papers — structure, notation, theorem/proof, numerics, complexity, figures, coherence. Includes a static Python verifier for automated triage of labels, cross-references, and structure.