Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add ShaishavMaisuria/research-paper-lifecycle-skills --skill write-abstractgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ShaishavMaisuria/research-paper-lifecycle-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/shaishavmaisuria/research-paper-lifecycle-skills/write-abstract)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/shaishavmaisuria/research-paper-lifecycle-skills/write-abstract"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/shaishavmaisuria/research-paper-lifecycle-skills/write-abstract/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/shaishavmaisuria/research-paper-lifecycle-skills/write-abstract"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/shaishavmaisuria/research-paper-lifecycle-skills/write-abstract.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00185 | $0.02046 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00074 | $0.00818 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00037 | $0.00409 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00018 | $0.00205 |
Grade A, and why
write-abstract scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 169 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Write Abstract
Produce a venue-compliant abstract — right length, right keywords block, five-move structure, verified numbers only — and, when the venue has a separate abstract-registration deadline, the complete registration card (title, abstract, authors, topics, COI list) ready to paste into the submission form.
When to use
- Drafting or rewriting an abstract for a specific venue or template family (acmart / IEEEtran / llncs / NeurIPS-style).
- Fitting an abstract to a word limit, or adding the missing CCS Concepts / Index Terms / keywords block.
- An abstract-registration deadline is approaching and the user must register title + abstract + topics + conflicts before the paper PDF.
Related skills: tailor-to-venue (whole-paper retargeting), parse-cfp
(build a missing venue profile), preflight-check (final desk-reject lint),
verify-citations (gate for any reference work).
Inputs
- The draft (main
.texpreferred — keyword blocks are checked in context) or the abstract as plain text; or, for a fresh draft, the paper's contributions and verified results from the user. - Venue profile:
venues/conferences/<id>.ymlorvenues/families/<f>.yml(schema:venues/schema.yml). If neither exists, do NOT invent venue facts — runparse-cfpon the CFP URL or quote the live CFP directly.
Process
1. Resolve venue norms, then re-verify (mandatory)
Load the profile (format.abstract_words, format.keywords,
deadlines.abstract/paper + timezone, review.blind). Profiles go
stale: before the user relies on a word limit, keyword requirement, or any
deadline, re-verify it against the live cfp_url and say what was checked
and when. If the CFP cannot be fetched, label every profile-derived fact
"UNVERIFIED — confirm on CFP". When abstract_words is null, present
150-250 words as a convention, never as a venue rule — see
references/venue-norms.md.
2. Draft (or diagnose) with the five-move structure
What ships with it
7 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 169 lines · 185 tokens per session scan A 421d8d6d9f98
write-abstract is a skill published in the GitHub repository ShaishavMaisuria/research-paper-lifecycle-skills (55 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 185 tokens to every session and 2,046 once invoked, about $0.0007 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
research-manager
Use this when starting a new research project or managing a complex, multi-step research workflow.
academic-writing
You must use this when producing any research prose — literature reviews, syntheses, analyses, methodology descriptions, discussion sections, abstracts, or any written output intended for an academic audience.
systematic-review
You must use this when conducting PRISMA-standard systematic reviews, protocol development, or Risk of Bias assessment.
hypothesis-testing
You must use this when formulating testable hypotheses, designing experimental controls, or defining falsification criteria.
multi-source-investigation
You must use this when investigating complex claims across diverse sources or fact-checking contradictory information.
peer-review
You must use this when critiquing academic manuscripts, evaluating methodological rigor, or providing structured reviewer feedback.