Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add ShaishavMaisuria/research-paper-lifecycle-skills --skill write-abstractgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ShaishavMaisuria/research-paper-lifecycle-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/shaishavmaisuria/research-paper-lifecycle-skills/write-abstract)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/shaishavmaisuria/research-paper-lifecycle-skills/write-abstract"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/shaishavmaisuria/research-paper-lifecycle-skills/write-abstract/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/shaishavmaisuria/research-paper-lifecycle-skills/write-abstract"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/shaishavmaisuria/research-paper-lifecycle-skills/write-abstract.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00185 | $0.02046 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00093 | $0.01023 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00037 | $0.00409 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00018 | $0.00205 |
Grade A, and why
write-abstract scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 169 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Write Abstract
Produce a venue-compliant abstract — right length, right keywords block, five-move structure, verified numbers only — and, when the venue has a separate abstract-registration deadline, the complete registration card (title, abstract, authors, topics, COI list) ready to paste into the submission form.
When to use
- Drafting or rewriting an abstract for a specific venue or template family (acmart / IEEEtran / llncs / NeurIPS-style).
- Fitting an abstract to a word limit, or adding the missing CCS Concepts / Index Terms / keywords block.
- An abstract-registration deadline is approaching and the user must register title + abstract + topics + conflicts before the paper PDF.
Related skills: tailor-to-venue (whole-paper retargeting), parse-cfp
(build a missing venue profile), preflight-check (final desk-reject lint),
verify-citations (gate for any reference work).
Inputs
- The draft (main
.texpreferred — keyword blocks are checked in context) or the abstract as plain text; or, for a fresh draft, the paper's contributions and verified results from the user. - Venue profile:
venues/conferences/<id>.ymlorvenues/families/<f>.yml(schema:venues/schema.yml). If neither exists, do NOT invent venue facts — runparse-cfpon the CFP URL or quote the live CFP directly.
Process
1. Resolve venue norms, then re-verify (mandatory)
Load the profile (format.abstract_words, format.keywords,
deadlines.abstract/paper + timezone, review.blind). Profiles go
stale: before the user relies on a word limit, keyword requirement, or any
deadline, re-verify it against the live cfp_url and say what was checked
and when. If the CFP cannot be fetched, label every profile-derived fact
"UNVERIFIED — confirm on CFP". When abstract_words is null, present
150-250 words as a convention, never as a venue rule — see
references/venue-norms.md.
2. Draft (or diagnose) with the five-move structure
What ships with it
7 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 169 lines · 185 tokens per session scan A 421d8d6d9f98
write-abstract is a skill published in the GitHub repository ShaishavMaisuria/research-paper-lifecycle-skills (42 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 185 tokens to every session and 2,046 once invoked, about $0.0009 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
aaai-reproducibility
Use when strengthening an AAAI paper's reproducibility checklist (placed after references), experimental traceability, seed and hyperparameter reporting, compute and cost disclosure, dataset access and licensing, code/data ZIP readiness, and the claim-to-evidence map that Phase-1 reviewers use to judge rigor across…
aaai-submission
Use when auditing an AAAI main technical track submission for OpenReview readiness, double-blind anonymity, page limits, reproducibility checklist, supplementary material, author limits, multiple-submission policy, and AAAI AI-use policy compliance.
acl-author-response
Use when drafting an ACL author response inside an ACL Rolling Review cycle on OpenReview, covering the response window before meta-review, reviewer discussion dynamics, score-change strategy, flagging review issues to the area chair, anonymity rules, and deciding between responding now versus revising for a later ARR…
acl-camera-ready
Use when preparing an accepted ACL main-conference or Findings paper for camera-ready, covering the extra content page, de-anonymization and acknowledgements, AI-assistance disclosure, keeping the Limitations section, ACL Anthology metadata and CC BY 4.0 publication, meta-review-driven edits, and presentation-mode…
acl-related-work
Use when positioning an ACL submission against the NLP literature, covering ACL Anthology citation practice, arXiv-versus-published version citation, concurrent LLM-era preprints, prior-cycle ARR resubmission overlap, anonymity-preserving self-citation, and the fast-moving baseline problem in computational linguistics.
acl-reproducibility
Use when strengthening reproducibility evidence for an ACL paper reviewed through ACL Rolling Review, covering the Responsible NLP checklist end to end, hyperparameter and compute reporting, prompt and decoding disclosure for LLM experiments, data contamination auditing, variance across runs, and checklist-to-paper…