Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to shashankswe2020-ux/whoop-mcp. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/shashankswe2020-ux/whoop-mcp/main/.github/skills/test-driven-development/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/shashankswe2020-ux/whoop-mcpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/shashankswe2020-ux/whoop-mcp/test-driven-development)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/shashankswe2020-ux/whoop-mcp/test-driven-development"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/shashankswe2020-ux/whoop-mcp/test-driven-development/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/shashankswe2020-ux/whoop-mcp/test-driven-development"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/shashankswe2020-ux/whoop-mcp/test-driven-development.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00050 | $0.03289 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00020 | $0.01316 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00658 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00329 |
Grade A, and why
test-driven-development scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
83% identical to test-driven-development — 25 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 380 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Test-Driven Development
Overview
Write a failing test before writing the code that makes it pass. For bug fixes, reproduce the bug with a test before attempting a fix. Tests are proof — "seems right" is not done. A codebase with good tests is an AI agent's superpower; a codebase without tests is a liability.
When to Use
- Implementing any new logic or behavior
- Fixing any bug (the Prove-It Pattern)
- Modifying existing functionality
- Adding edge case handling
- Any change that could break existing behavior
When NOT to use: Pure configuration changes, documentation updates, or static content changes that have no behavioral impact.
Related: For browser-based changes, combine TDD with runtime verification using Chrome DevTools MCP — see the Browser Testing section below.
The TDD Cycle
RED GREEN REFACTOR
Write a test Write minimal code Clean up the
that fails ──→ to make it pass ──→ implementation ──→ (repeat)
│ │ │
▼ ▼ ▼
Test FAILS Test PASSES Tests still PASS
Step 1: RED — Write a Failing Test
Write the test first. It must fail. A test that passes immediately proves nothing.
// RED: This test fails because createTask doesn't exist yet
describe('TaskService', () => {
it('creates a task with title and default status', async () => {
const task = await taskService.createTask({ title: 'Buy groceries' });
expect(task.id).toBeDefined();
expect(task.title).toBe('Buy groceries');
expect(task.status).toBe('pending');
expect(task.createdAt).toBeInstanceOf(Date);
});
});
Step 2: GREEN — Make It Pass
Write the minimum code to make the test pass. Don't over-engineer:
// GREEN: Minimal implementation
export async function createTask(input: { title: string }): Promise<Task> {
const task = {
id: generateId(),
title: input.title,
status: 'pending' as const,
createdAt: new Date(),
};
await db.tasks.insert(task);
return task;
}
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 380 lines · 50 tokens per session scan A fc76d105d467
test-driven-development is a skill published in the GitHub repository shashankswe2020-ux/whoop-mcp (174 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 50 tokens to every session and 3,289 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 83% identical to test-driven-development, differing in 25 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
tdd
Use test-driven development for behavior-changing feature or fix work, and whenever the user mentions TDD, test-first, red-green-refactor, tracer bullets, integration tests, or public-interface behavior tests. Skip for docs-only, path-only rename, formatting-only, or purely mechanical chores unless explicitly…
verify
Run the checks that have to pass before a FreeReps commit lands — Go build, vet, tests and golangci-lint, the frontend type check and build, and the document contract check. Triggers — "verify", "prüf das durch", "vor dem commit", "läuft das durch", "check before committing", "run the checks", "does CI pass". Not for…
test-writer
Write thorough tests following TDD and BDD principles.
sumo-qa-implementing-with-tdd
Use after sumo-qa-deciding-approach picks tdd-scaffold, regression-first, or coverage-first-then-refactor — e.g. "write a regression test for this bug" or "scaffold the failing tests first". Walks plan → name-the-risk-and-test-idea → confirm → red → hand off → green → review, one section per turn with confirmation…
tdd
Test-driven development discipline: the red-green-refactor cycle, the testing pyramid's proportion of unit/integration/e2e, Fowler's test-double taxonomy, and the FIRST properties of a test worth keeping. Use when building a feature or fixing a bug test-first, mentions "TDD" or "red-green-refactor", or when deciding…
tdd-workflow
Use this skill when writing new features, fixing bugs, or refactoring code. Enforces test-driven development with 80%+ coverage including unit, integration, and E2E tests.