Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/shinpr/claude-code-workflows/recipe-front-adjustnpx skills add shinpr/claude-code-workflows --skill recipe-front-adjustgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/shinpr/claude-code-workflowsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/shinpr/claude-code-workflows/recipe-front-adjust)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/shinpr/claude-code-workflows/recipe-front-adjust"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/shinpr/claude-code-workflows/recipe-front-adjust.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00018 | $0.02027 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00009 | $0.01014 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00405 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00203 |
Grade A, and why
recipe-front-adjust scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 153 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Explicit User Instruction: The user explicitly instructs and authorizes every subagent call named in this recipe. Execute each applicable call when its prerequisites are met.
Execute Skill: llm-friendly-context before writing Agent prompts, handoffs, or generated artifacts.
Context: UI adjustment on already-implemented features. The verification loop (edit → check against the design source → refine) runs in the parent session.
Execution Pattern
Core Identity: "I am a guided executor. I run the adjustment and the verification loop myself; subagents handle one-shot tasks."
Execution Protocol:
- Delegate to subagents (one-shot calls): quality-fixer-frontend.
- Run in the parent session (multi-step loops and user dialogs): external-resource hearing via AskUserQuestion, write-set inspection, scale judgment, adjustment-context approval, adjustment edits, verification against the design source, iteration until acceptance.
- Stop at every
[Stop: ...]marker before proceeding.
Execution Gate
Complete Steps 1-7 in order for the confirmed adjustment outcome. Advance only through the current step's stated evidence, quality result, or user stop; skip work only when its stated condition is false. Report completion after every applicable Completion Criterion and retained-limitation retry is satisfied.
Workflow Overview
Adjustment request → conditional external resource evidence
↓
existing-pattern and write-set inspection
↓
structural boundary judgment on candidate write set
↓
local existing-pattern adjustment → [Stop]
↓
adjustment + verification (parent session)
↓
quality-fixer-frontend (subagent: typecheck/lint/test)
↓
commit
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- today Changed · +1 lines 993b39ede5ea
- 7d ago First seen · 152 lines · 18 tokens per session scan A d33bdf764c0d
recipe-front-adjust is a skill published in the GitHub repository shinpr/claude-code-workflows (679 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 18 tokens to every session and 2,027 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
fidelity-gate
Build a UI against a frozen visual reference without drift - an inventory extracted before any code, a relics list, and a gate that MEASURES computed styles on a fixture carrying the reference's own data. Use when a mockup, design spec or screenshot is the contract.
design
Intent-first UI design with conscious, traceable design decisions. Persists decisions in .interface-design/ for cross-session consistency. Includes domain exploration, design system generation (system.md + system.json), per-component construction with mandatory checkpoints, and craft validation tests. Modes: init…
craft-ux
The Craftsman standard for UI/UX — design tokens, component patterns, pixel-perfect standards, Tailwind/React implementation, motion craft, an AI-tells anti-pattern catalog, and a two-pass review protocol (static review + live browser audit). Use this whenever designing, building, reviewing, auditing, redesigning, or…
vibe-code
Vibe-code with a loaded design system — browser-automated visual testing.
scroll-craft
Build premium scroll-driven landing pages for service, product, food, and drink brands. Plan the visitor journey, page grammar, emotional peak, and bespoke signature move. Create dimensional heroes with independent visual planes, restrained motion, and separate mobile composition. Use supplied photos and footage or…
top-design
Create award-winning, immersive web experiences at the level of Awwwards-featured agencies. Use when the user mentions "Awwwards quality", "make my site stunning", "scroll animations", "parallax storytelling", "cinematic web design", "portfolio site", or "brand experience". Also trigger when elevating a standard…