Getting it into your agent
This one installs as part of its plugin. Adding the marketplace and installing the plugin brings it with everything else the plugin ships.
/plugin marketplace add shrekshrek/project-workflow/plugin install project-workflowWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/shrekshrek/project-workflow/spec-revise)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/shrekshrek/project-workflow/spec-revise"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/shrekshrek/project-workflow/spec-revise.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00050 | $0.00268 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00025 | $0.00134 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00054 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00027 |
Grade A, and why
spec-revise scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Spec Revise
Match the user's language and preserve file language. Read ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/docs/actions/spec-revise.md completely before acting; it owns the revision workflow and contract.
Claude execution details:
- Resolve
$ARGUMENTSthrough the shared active-feature rules and apply the canonical record/lifecycle routing. - Read root/applicable nested
AGENTS.md, recomputing applicability if the affected module population changes. - When canonical
ADR_REQUIREDapplies, search only relevant ADR metadata/references and instantiate only from${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/template/docs/adr/0000-template.md. - Apply the canonical revision workflow under the current authorization.
- Dispatch a fresh
decision-completeness-auditoronly at its narrowed canonical boundary, with fallback under the shared execution contract. Blocking or unreliable audit evidence prevents apply. - Apply the authorized revision without restoring via checkout, rewriting unrelated history, or committing.
Report the canonical revision result and applicable Reviewer execution without adding an adapter-specific schema.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 22 lines · 50 tokens per session scan A 2b0ff1de52e7
spec-revise is a skill published in the GitHub repository shrekshrek/project-workflow (2 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 50 tokens to every session and 268 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
evolve
Research-driven multi-cycle improvement director. Forms causal hypotheses about why scores are low, validates them with scout agents before attacking, dispatches axis-parallel fleet attacks, extracts transferable patterns, and runs indefinitely within a budget envelope. Accumulates a persistent belief model and…
improve
Autonomous quality improvement loop. Scores a target against a rubric, selects the highest-leverage axis, attacks it, verifies, documents, and loops. No pre-planning between iterations — each loop re-scores from scratch.
review
5-pass structured code review — correctness, security, performance, readability, consistency.
marshal
Meta-orchestrator that takes any direction — broad, specific, or vague — and autonomously chains skills and context into actionable work. Gathers context from codebase, docs, and memory. Only asks the user when it genuinely cannot proceed. Single-session orchestrator.
systematic-debugging
4-phase root cause analysis: observe, hypothesize, verify, fix. Enforces investigation before any code changes. Emergency stop after 2 failed fixes. Prevents shotgun debugging and fix cascades.
qiongli
Qiongli version: v1.17.0. Cross-platform academic research workflow for Codex, Claude / Claude Code, and CLI. Use for academic research lifecycle work: paper planning, literature review, paper reading, gap finding, study design, manuscript writing, statistics, analysis code, reproducibility, proofread, rebuttal…