Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add siviter-xyz/dot-agent --skill psigit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/siviter-xyz/dot-agentWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/siviter-xyz/dot-agent/psi)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/siviter-xyz/dot-agent/psi"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/siviter-xyz/dot-agent/psi/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/siviter-xyz/dot-agent/psi"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/siviter-xyz/dot-agent/psi.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00047 | $0.00668 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00023 | $0.00334 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00134 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00067 |
Grade A, and why
psi scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 76 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
PSI - Plan Spec Implement
Structured workflow for planning, specifying, and implementing changes with documentation-first approach.
When to Use
Only use when:
- Explicitly directed by the user
- Mentioned in project
AGENTS.mdfile
Do not use automatically - this is an opt-in workflow, not a default.
Core Workflow
Plan → Spec → Implement
Phases are independent - you can start with any phase, but all must ensure documentation stays up-to-date.
Key Principles
- Ephemeral planning - Plans stored in
~/.dot-agent/(not committed) - Documentation-first - Specs applied to project docs/READMEs/AGENTS.md
- Test-first implementation - Tests for docs/user journeys before code
- Design/review embedded - Design and review integrated into Plan/Spec phases
- Phase independence - Each phase can work standalone, all update docs
Phase Overview
Plan Phase
- Generates detailed plans in
~/.dot-agent/repo/YYYY-MM-work-name.plan.md - Research stored in
~/.dot-agent/working-dir/repo/YYYY-MM-work-name.research.md - Embeds design considerations
- Includes review before proceeding
Spec Phase
- Generates specs for: API schemas, interfaces, DTOs, database models, config, env vars, architecture, user journeys, package structure, tech choices
- Embeds design considerations
- Reviews specs before applying
- Applies to:
docs/, README.md files, AGENTS.md files
Implement Phase
- Test-first: tests for docs/user journeys before code
- CI verification: verify types, tests, lint pass before committing
- Atomic commits: group related changes with tests
- Updates docs, README.md, AGENTS.md as code evolves
- Can work independently if specs exist in docs
Research Management
Detects phrases like:
- "looking at your research" → Loads research file
- "refine your research" → Updates research file, narrows focus
Documentation Structure
- README.md: Aim for < 1000 lines (not hard rule), can be longer if needed
- AGENTS.md: < 200 lines, inline at root/packages/modules/code level
- docs/: Architecture, roadmap, tech-choices, setup/, user-journeys/, design/
What ships with it
12 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- LICENSE 1.0 KB
- README.md 2.6 KB
- references/docs-structure.md 2.9 KB
- references/file-paths.md 2.6 KB
- references/implement-phase.md 3.9 KB
- references/plan-phase.md 2.7 KB
- references/research-management.md 2.4 KB
- references/review-protocol.md 2.8 KB
- references/spec-phase.md 3.6 KB
- scripts/get-plan-path.js 906 B runs code
- scripts/get-research-path.js 965 B runs code
- scripts/show-plan-location.js 732 B runs code
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 76 lines · 47 tokens per session scan A b9e814607af1
psi is a skill published in the GitHub repository siviter-xyz/dot-agent (21 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 47 tokens to every session and 668 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
engram-testing-coverage
TDD and coverage standards for Engram. Trigger: When implementing behavior changes in any package.
iterative-development
TDD iteration loops using Claude Code Stop hooks - runs tests after each response, feeds failures back automatically.
python
Python development with ruff, mypy, pytest - TDD and type safety.
nw-fp-clojure
Clojure language-specific patterns, data-first modeling, REPL-driven development, and spec.
strict-tdd
Strict RED->GREEN->REFACTOR test-driven development with enforcement. Never write production code before a failing test. Atomic commits per TDD cycle.
mobiai-mobile-tdd
You MUST use this before writing any implementation code for a mobile feature, bug fix, refactor, or behavior change. Tests come before implementation — no exceptions.