Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/sjarmak/agent-workflows/premortemnpx skills add sjarmak/agent-workflows --skill premortemgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/sjarmak/agent-workflowsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/sjarmak/agent-workflows/premortem)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/sjarmak/agent-workflows/premortem"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/sjarmak/agent-workflows/premortem.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00000 | $0.01683 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00842 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00337 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00168 |
Grade A, and why
premortem scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 169 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Prospective Failure Narratives. Spawns N independent agents, each writing a narrative from the future where the project FAILED for a different root cause. No agent sees others' failure stories. A lead agent then synthesizes all failure narratives into a structured risk registry with severity ratings and mitigations.
Based on Gary Klein's premortem technique: "prospective hindsight" — imagining an event has already occurred — increases the ability to identify reasons for future outcomes by ~30%. Starting from "it failed" bypasses the planning fallacy and optimism bias that normally prevent teams from envisioning failure modes.
Arguments
$ARGUMENTS — format: [N] [path/to/design.md or inline description] where N is optional failure-lens count (default: 5, min 3, max 7)
Parse Arguments
Extract:
- agent_count: the optional leading integer (default 5, min 3, max 7)
- input: path to a design document, architecture doc, PRD, or project plan — or an inline project description
If the input is missing or unclear, ask the user to clarify before proceeding.
Phase 1: Frame the Project
If a file path is given: read it and extract the key design decisions, architecture, dependencies, and assumptions.
If inline: parse the project description.
Prepare a project brief that includes:
- What is being built
- Key technical decisions
- Dependencies (internal and external)
- Timeline constraints
- Team context (if available)
- Critical assumptions
Present the project brief to the user and confirm before proceeding. Adjust if the user gives feedback.
Phase 2: Spawn Failure Agents
Launch all N agents in parallel using the Agent tool. Each agent gets the same project brief and a unique failure lens — a category of failure they must explore.
Standard Failure Lenses
Select N from the following (always include lenses 1-3, then fill remaining slots in order):
- Technical Architecture Failure — the core technical approach was wrong (scaling limits, fundamental design flaw, performance cliff, wrong data model)
- Integration & Dependency Failure — external dependencies failed or changed (API deprecation, library vulnerability, vendor shutdown, incompatible upgrade)
- Operational Failure — the system works in dev but fails in production (deployment complexity, monitoring gaps, incident response blind spots, data migration corruption)
- Scope & Requirements Failure — we built the wrong thing (misunderstood requirements, missed stakeholder needs, wrong assumptions about user behavior)
- Team & Process Failure — the people-side failed (knowledge silos, handoff gaps, testing shortcuts, documentation debt)
- Security & Compliance Failure — security breach, data leak, regulatory violation, access control gap
- Scale & Evolution Failure — works at current scale but breaks at 10x (database bottleneck, cost explosion, architectural ceiling)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 169 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 505a54514788
premortem is a skill published in the GitHub repository sjarmak/agent-workflows (9 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 1,683 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
speckit.specify
Skill "speckit.specify" from caipe-io/ai-platform-engineering, covering user input, outline, quick guidelines, section requirements and for ai generation.
speckit.clarify
Skill "speckit.clarify" from caipe-io/ai-platform-engineering, covering user input and outline.
local-integration-testing
Run end-to-end integration tests with all 15 agents and supervisor in local Docker Compose dev environment. Validates agent discovery, multi-agent routing, checkpoint persistence, and cross-agent follow-up conversations.
release-docs
Generate a combined release blog post for ai-platform-engineering. Produces a single docs/releases/YYYY-MM-DD-release-X-Y-Z.md file containing release notes and the upgrade guide (migration guide) inline. Use when cutting a release, when a user asks "what changed in 0.4.x", or when upgrading their values.yaml to a new…
update-docs
Audit and update all documentation moving parts for ai-platform-engineering. Checks release blog posts, features page, agent docs, homepage version strings, Docusaurus version config, and sidebar completeness. Fixes what is stale and reports what needs manual attention. Use after cutting a release, adding a new agent…
docker-compose-first-install
Validate and repair the OSS first-install Docker Compose path. Use when editing docker-compose.yaml, docker-compose.dev.yaml, .env.example, release image tags, Compose profiles, Keycloak/OpenFGA/RAG defaults, or first-launch UI behavior for local all-in-one installs.