Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add skala-io/legal-skills --skill saft-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/skala-io/legal-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/skala-io/legal-skills/saft-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/skala-io/legal-skills/saft-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/skala-io/legal-skills/saft-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/skala-io/legal-skills/saft-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/skala-io/legal-skills/saft-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00114 | $0.03617 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00057 | $0.01809 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00023 | $0.00723 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00362 |
Grade A, and why
saft-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 413 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
First published on Skala Legal Skills
Legal Disclaimer
This skill is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The analysis and information provided should not be relied upon as a substitute for consultation with a qualified attorney. No attorney-client relationship is created by using this skill. Cryptocurrency and token regulations vary significantly by jurisdiction and change frequently. SAFTs involve complex securities law considerations. Always consult with a licensed attorney experienced in securities and cryptocurrency law before entering into any SAFT agreement. The creators and publishers of this skill disclaim any liability for actions taken or not taken based on the information provided.
SAFT Review Skill
Review and advise on Simple Agreements for Future Tokens (SAFTs), token warrants, and token side letters.
Critical Note: SAFTs are generally considered securities under US law. The SEC has taken aggressive enforcement action against SAFT offerings. Unlike SAFEs, there is no industry-standard SAFT template—terms vary significantly between agreements.
Entry Points
This skill handles four scenarios:
- Document Review - User uploads a SAFT, token warrant, or token side letter for analysis
- Legal Questions - User asks how SAFTs work or about token fundraising
- Drafting Request - User wants to generate a SAFT template
- Regulatory Guidance - User asks about securities law implications
Workflow
1. Document Review
When user uploads a SAFT or token-related agreement:
-
Identify the document type:
- SAFT (Simple Agreement for Future Tokens)
- Token Warrant (often attached to equity financing)
- Token Side Letter (supplement to SAFE or equity round)
-
Review all key terms systematically:
- Deadline date and network launch definition
- Token definition and allocation
- Pricing mechanism (fixed vs. variable)
- Vesting and lockup schedules
- Cancellation and refund rights
- Resale restrictions
- MFN provisions
- Regulatory representations
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 413 lines · 114 tokens per session scan A 421e10200dc3
saft-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository skala-io/legal-skills (48 stars, last pushed 7mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 114 tokens to every session and 3,617 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
category-designer
Define a new category where your product wins by default. Reframe the buying decision. Triggers on: "create a category", "category design", "define my category", "category of one", "reframe the market", "position as category king", "new category", "category creation", "own a category", "category strategy"…
crypto-exchange-agb
Für Crypto Exchange AGB: ordnet Norm, Beweislast und Gegenargument; Ergebnis: Prüfprodukt mit Risiko und nächstem Schritt. Fachgebiet: AGB-Recht-Prüfer. Route: crypto-exchange-agb.
agent-commerce-identity-payments-arbitration
ERC-8004 identity, x402 payments, and arbitration protocol for autonomous agent commerce. The three rails for the machine economy.
agent-governance-compliance-contracts
Interact with AgentConstitution governance contracts on Base Sepolia. Check compliance, read rules, log actions, query governance state.
nla-create
Create a Natural Language Agreement escrow on-chain. Use when the user wants to lock ERC20 tokens in an escrow with a natural language demand that an AI oracle will arbitrate. Handles demand crafting, parameter gathering, and CLI execution.
legal-risk-assessment
Severity-by-likelihood legal risk register for a situation or deal — enumerates concrete risks, scores each one impact 1-5 × likelihood 1-5, renders a heat-map table, attaches mitigations to every risk at or above threshold, defines escalation criteria for immediate human counsel, and sets monitoring triggers. Use…