Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add spiralcrew-ou/profilespider-agent-skills --skill partner-qualificationgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/spiralcrew-ou/profilespider-agent-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/spiralcrew-ou/profilespider-agent-skills/partner-qualification)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/spiralcrew-ou/profilespider-agent-skills/partner-qualification"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/spiralcrew-ou/profilespider-agent-skills/partner-qualification/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/spiralcrew-ou/profilespider-agent-skills/partner-qualification"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/spiralcrew-ou/profilespider-agent-skills/partner-qualification.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00039 | $0.00428 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00016 | $0.00171 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00086 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00043 |
Grade A, and why
partner-qualification scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Partner Qualification
Purpose
Evaluate potential channel, integration, affiliate, or strategic partners against partnership goals.
When to use this skill
- Prioritizing a partner long-list
- Classifying the likely partnership type per candidate
- Surfacing competitive or channel-conflict risks
- Sequencing partnership outreach
When not to use this skill
- You have no partnership goals or target markets defined
- The records lack enough signal to assess fit
- You need contract terms rather than a fit assessment
Required inputs
- Partner profiles
- Partnership goals
- Required capabilities
Optional inputs
- Target markets
- Existing partners to avoid overlap
- Preferred partnership types
Rules
- Score against stated partnership goals only.
- Use evidence from the profiles; do not assume capabilities.
- Flag competitive overlap and channel conflict explicitly.
- Separate facts from strategic assumptions.
- Apply the same framework to every candidate.
Process
- Parse partnership goals and required capabilities.
- Assess each candidate for fit and overlap.
- Classify the most fitting partnership type.
- Estimate strategic value and risks.
- Score fit and assign an outreach priority.
Output format
Return one record per partner with the following fields:
- partner_fit_score
- partnership_type
- strategic_value
- risks
- recommended_outreach_priority
Validation
- Confirm partnership type follows from the evidence.
- Confirm risks include any competitive overlap.
- Confirm priorities are comparable across candidates.
Limitations
- Strategic value is an estimate, not a forecast.
- Partnership fit depends on relationship factors not present in records.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 83 lines · 39 tokens per session scan A 83435507a11d
partner-qualification is a skill published in the GitHub repository spiralcrew-ou/profilespider-agent-skills (11 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 39 tokens to every session and 428 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
partner-qualification compared with skills from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| partner-qualificationspiralcrew-ou/profilespider-agent-skills | Skill | 11 | 4mo ago | MIT | A | 39 | Claude Code, Codex |
| squeeze-page-builderAffitor/affiliate-skills | Skill | 767 | 18d ago | MIT | A | 114 | Claude Code |
| deepline-ads-audiencesgetaero-io/gtm-eng-skills | Skill | 73 | yesterday | MIT | A | 133 | Claude Code, Codex |
| deepline-enginegetaero-io/gtm-eng-skills | Skill | 73 | yesterday | MIT | A | 43 | Claude Code, Codex |
| deepline-plays-reviewgetaero-io/gtm-eng-skills | Skill | 73 | yesterday | MIT | A | 121 | Codex |
| b2b-marketing-playbookGingiris-1031/gingiris-skills | Skill | 89 | 2d ago | MIT | A | 53 | Claude Code, Codex |
| deepline-crm-cleaninggetaero-io/gtm-eng-skills | Skill | 73 | yesterday | MIT | A | 73 | Claude Code, Codex |