Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/stacklok/toolhive-catalog/mcp-reviewnpx skills add stacklok/toolhive-catalog --skill mcp-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/stacklok/toolhive-catalogWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/stacklok/toolhive-catalog/mcp-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/stacklok/toolhive-catalog/mcp-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/stacklok/toolhive-catalog/mcp-review.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00051 | $0.03140 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00026 | $0.01570 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00628 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00314 |
Grade A, and why
mcp-review scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Makes network callslowCapability
Not a fault in itself. Listed so you know the mod talks to something, and to what.
curl -sS -X POST "<remote-url>" \ How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 248 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
MCP Server Specification Review
You are an expert reviewer for the ToolHive Registry. Evaluate server.json files and MCP server submissions for spec compliance, security, registry inclusion criteria, and completeness.
For detailed field specs, see server-json-spec.md. For full registry inclusion criteria, see registry-criteria.md and server-criteria.md.
Registry Layout (read first)
The repo has two server registries, and submissions land in the wrong one often enough to check first:
registries/toolhive/servers/— the contribution path. All new submissions go here.registries/official/— a curated subset maintained by the ToolHive team. Contributors should not hand-add entries here.
Both normalize every entry under the io.github.stacklok publisher namespace (name: io.github.stacklok/<server-name> and the _meta publisher key), with a repo-hosted icon.svg. A PR that adds a file under registries/official/, or uses a third-party namespace like io.github.<contributor>, is a finding — not a style nit. task catalog:validate does not catch either; verify by eye and by comparing against a neighboring entry (jq '{name, ns: (._meta[...]|keys)}' <neighbor>/server.json).
Review Workflow
Step 1: Identify Change Scope
Determine what you're reviewing:
- New server submission → Full review (spec + repository assessment + inclusion criteria)
- Version update → Focused review (changed fields, both identifier and _meta key updated, changelog)
- Config change → Targeted review (just the changed aspects + security implications)
Step 2: Validate server.json
Read the server.json and check, in order:
- Location & namespace — file is under
registries/toolhive/servers/<name>/;nameand the_metapublisher key are bothio.github.stacklok(see Registry Layout) - Server type —
packages(container) orremotes(remote)? - Required top-level fields —
$schema,name,description,title,version,repository,icons - Package/remote config — identifier format, transport type valid for server type
- Extension key match —
_metakey must exactly equalpackages[0].identifierorremotes[0].url - Extension fields —
tier,status,tools,overviewall present and valid - Tier matches maintainer —
Officialis reserved for the ToolHive team, the MCP spec authors, or the platform owner of the integrated service. A third-party contributor's server isCommunity, regardless of what the PR claims (don't trust the field — check who maintains the repo) - Icons — repo-hosted
icon.svg(mimeType: image/svg+xml) AND anicon.svgfile present in the server dir. Flag external icon URLs (e.g. a vendor PNG) — they're a stability/supply-chain risk and break the convention - Overview format — starts with
## Title\n\nfollowed by 3-5 sentences - No auto-populated fields — reject if
metadata.*ortool_definitionspresent in new submissions - Remote-specific — tags include
"remote";oauth_configpresent if OAuth required - Container-specific —
transport.urlpresent when type isstreamable-http
What ships with it
3 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 248 lines · 51 tokens per session scan A f218f119daad
mcp-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository stacklok/toolhive-catalog (22 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 51 tokens to every session and 3,140 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (makes network calls). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
agent-registry
Discover, register, and hire ERC-8004 autonomous agents across 22,000+ agents on EVM + Solana. Search by capability, check on-chain reputation scores, compare agent services by category with composite scoring, browse the service catalog, enrich agent profiles, check buyer reputation, and get complete machine-readable…
npm-search
Search npm packages, compare libraries, and check download stats via MCP. Use when evaluating or researching npm packages.
opik-diagnose
Surface the Opik traces worth a developer's attention, ranked by signal — errors, failed tool calls, latency, regressions, and low online-eval scores — plus Diagnostics issues. Reads live/production traces via the SDK (searchtraces and agentinsights) and works with no MCP; uses the MCP issue entity when connected.…
client-scripts
Write ServiceNow client scripts (onLoad/onChange/onSubmit/onCellEdit) using gform, guser, GlideAjax, field visibility/mandatory toggles, and validation with debounced server calls.
agoragentic-transaction-assurance
Prepare, evaluate, and reconcile autonomous agent transactions without self-granting payment or owner authority. Use when an agent must bind principal authority, seller terms, payment evidence, execution, delivered outcome, and reconciliation; handle paid retries safely; or prepare an authority request for owner…
maya-shot-export
Pipeline stage — shot-level export: frame ranges, cameras, FBX / Alembic packaging for editorial. Use when packaging shot data for downstream departments. Not for full pipeline publish (maya-pipeline) or scene assembly (maya-scene-assembly).