Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Stallin-Sanamandra/b2b-saas-marketing-skills --skill competitive-battlecard-generatorgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Stallin-Sanamandra/b2b-saas-marketing-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/stallin-sanamandra/b2b-saas-marketing-skills/competitive-battlecard-generator)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/stallin-sanamandra/b2b-saas-marketing-skills/competitive-battlecard-generator"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/stallin-sanamandra/b2b-saas-marketing-skills/competitive-battlecard-generator/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/stallin-sanamandra/b2b-saas-marketing-skills/competitive-battlecard-generator"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/stallin-sanamandra/b2b-saas-marketing-skills/competitive-battlecard-generator.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00153 | $0.08082 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00077 | $0.04041 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00031 | $0.01616 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00015 | $0.00808 |
Grade A, and why
competitive-battlecard-generator scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 866 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Competitive Battlecard Generator
A sequential system for building, maintaining, and deploying competitive intelligence as battlecards. Each phase produces a defined output that feeds the next. Phase 6 captures field intel that keeps battlecards current rather than letting them decay into shelf-ware.
Why This Skill Exists
Competitive battlecards at most B2B SaaS companies are one of two things:
-
A feature comparison matrix that nobody reads. Marketing builds a table comparing 40 features. Checkmarks everywhere. Sales never opens it because it doesn't tell them what to say when a prospect mentions the competitor on a live call.
-
Tribal knowledge in the heads of 2-3 senior reps. They know what to say because they've lost deals to this competitor before. Nobody else on the team has that context. When those reps leave, the intel leaves with them.
Both fail because they confuse information with enablement. A battlecard isn't a data sheet. It's a decision aid that tells a rep exactly what to say, what to ask, and what to avoid in a competitive deal, specific to the persona they're talking to.
This skill builds battlecards that sales and BDRs actually use, keeps them current with field feedback, and connects them to the rest of your go-to-market stack.
When to Use This Skill
- Building a battlecard for a specific competitor from scratch
- Updating an existing battlecard with new competitive intel
- Responding to a competitor's product launch, pricing change, or acquisition
- Preparing a BDR or AE for a deal where a specific competitor is involved
- Analyzing win/loss data to identify competitive patterns
- Building persona-specific competitive talk tracks
- Reviewing competitive positioning as part of quarterly planning
- Onboarding new sales/BDR team members on competitive landscape
When NOT to Use This Skill
- General market research or industry analysis (this is competitor-specific)
- Product roadmap planning (competitive intel informs it, but this isn't a product management skill)
- Pricing strategy (this skill covers how to handle competitor pricing objections, not how to set your own prices)
- Content creation for comparison/alternative pages (use SEO or content skills for that; this skill produces internal enablement, not external content)
- Evaluating potential acquisition targets (different analysis framework)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 866 lines · 153 tokens per session scan A 7cb5badfe45d
competitive-battlecard-generator is a skill published in the GitHub repository Stallin-Sanamandra/b2b-saas-marketing-skills (5 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 153 tokens to every session and 8,082 once invoked, about $0.0008 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
fedramp
Expert guidance for FedRAMP certification and compliance under CR26 (FedRAMP Consolidated Rules for 2026). Use this skill whenever a user asks about FedRAMP authorization, ATO (Authority to Operate), cloud security for federal government, NIST SP 800-53 controls, CSP compliance, or any of the core FedRAMP document…
iso42001
Expert ISO 42001 AI Management System (AIMS) compliance advisor. Use this skill whenever a user asks about ISO/IEC 42001:2023, AI governance, AI management systems, AI risk assessment, AI system impact assessment, Annex A controls for AI, Statement of Applicability for AI systems, AI policy, responsible AI, AI…
eu-cra
Expert EU Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) advisor for Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 — mandatory cybersecurity and vulnerability handling requirements for all products with digital elements (PDEs) sold in the EU. Use this skill for gap analysis, product classification (Default / Class I / Class II), conformity assessment route…
nist-800-53
NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 compliance advisor — all 20 control families (AC, AT, AU, CA, CM, CP, IA, IR, MA, MP, PE, PL, PM, PS, PT, RA, SA, SC, SI, SR), Low/Moderate/High baseline selection, FIPS 199/200 system categorization, control tailoring and overlays, privacy controls (PT family), supply chain risk management (SR…
hipaa-compliance
Expert HIPAA compliance assistant for healthcare and software contexts. Use this skill whenever the user mentions HIPAA, PHI (Protected Health Information), ePHI, covered entities, business associates, healthcare data privacy, medical records, health information security, BAA (Business Associate Agreements), or any…
GRC & Compliance
Governance, risk, and compliance — risk assessment and scoring, control mapping across NIST CSF 2.0 / ISO 27001:2022 / SOC 2 / CIS Controls v8, gap analysis, audit evidence preparation, and security policy generation.