Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add StamKavid/last-ds-mile --skill ds-methodgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/StamKavid/last-ds-mileWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/stamkavid/last-ds-mile/ds-method)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/stamkavid/last-ds-mile/ds-method"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/stamkavid/last-ds-mile/ds-method.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00073 | $0.01934 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00036 | $0.00967 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00387 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00193 |
Grade A, and why
ds-method scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 126 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
ds-method — The Last DS Mile Discipline Layer
Overview
Every /ds-* stage skill in this plugin inherits this shared voice. This is not a
pipeline stage itself — it defines the Red Flags, Rationalizations, and Hard Gates that
every stage cites, so a project can't quietly drift into leakage, inflated metrics, or
unreproducible results.
When to Use
- Referenced automatically by every stage skill (
ds-framethroughds-handoff) — you should not need to invoke it directly. - Use directly when the user asks "why do I need a baseline," pushes back on a gate, or you need to decide whether a stage should stop and ask before proceeding.
Core Process
- When a stage skill's process reaches a point covered below, check the relevant table instead of inventing new judgment calls ad hoc — this keeps behavior consistent across every stage.
- When a discipline gate applies and its artifact is missing, produce it inline — run the prior stage's work yourself, in the same turn, and say plainly what you produced and why. Never silently work around a missing gate artifact, and never end the turn asking the user to go run a separate command first: the gate is satisfied by doing the work, not by requesting permission to do it.
- When a safety gate applies (see below), stop and ask before proceeding — these are the cases where continuing unilaterally could be irreversible or externally visible.
- Before running a stage's full process, climb the stage ladder: (a) does that
stage's artifact already exist? if so, reuse it, don't redo it. (b) does this
request actually need it, or can the ask be answered without it (see
ds-method's guard against escalating a plain question)? (c) can it be satisfied in a couple of lines in the run's notes, rather than a full stage write-up? Stop at the first rung that resolves it. If you track progress with a todo list, keep one list for the whole run, not a fresh create/update pair per stage — a dozen-plus todo-tool calls for a single request is a sign the ladder above wasn't applied. - Pick the artifact mode once, at the start, and say which you picked:
- Express (default for a single-shot request answered in one session — "build a
model for X and tell me how it does"): write one
.last-ds-mile/run.mdcarrying every stage's output — framing, baseline, validation choice, model comparison, evaluation/slices — as sections in that one file, not a dozen separatestages/*.mdfiles. The gates and their evidence still all have to be there; only the file layout is consolidated. - Full per-stage (a genuine multi-session project, or the user asks to run a
specific
/ds-*stage on its own): each stage writes its own.last-ds-mile/stages/NN-name.mdas described in that stage's own Core Process — this is what makes stages resumable and reviewable independently across sessions. - Once a project has
.last-ds-mile/stages/files, stay in full per-stage mode for consistency; don't switch an in-progress project to express mid-way.
- Express (default for a single-shot request answered in one session — "build a
model for X and tell me how it does"): write one
- When a Red Flag fires, say so out loud before continuing, even if the user seems to want to move fast — a flagged result that turns out fine costs one sentence; a leaked metric that ships costs the project's credibility.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 126 lines · 73 tokens per session scan A c58b0f6b8328
ds-method is a skill published in the GitHub repository StamKavid/last-ds-mile (3 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 73 tokens to every session and 1,934 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
science-vibecoding
Structured AI-assisted scientific code generation. 6 safety guards, 8 principles, 11 prompt templates. Grounded in Nature (2026).
metabolomics-analysis
Untargeted and targeted metabolomics data analysis using pyMZML, mzTab-M processing, and metabolite identification. Use for LC-MS/GC-MS feature detection, metabolite annotation, differential metabolite analysis, pathway mapping, and metabolic flux visualization. Covers XCMS-compatible workflows in Python.
neuroscience-imaging
Neuroimaging data analysis with nilearn, nibabel, and fMRIPrep outputs. Use for fMRI/MRI data loading, brain atlas parcellation, functional connectivity analysis, GLM-based task fMRI, resting-state network analysis, and publication-quality brain visualizations. Covers structural MRI, task fMRI, and rs-fMRI workflows.
ngs-pipeline-management
Next-generation sequencing pipeline management with Snakemake and Nextflow. Use for building, running, and debugging reproducible NGS workflows for RNA-seq, WGS, ChIP-seq, ATAC-seq, and amplicon sequencing. Covers pipeline design patterns, HPC/cloud execution, containerization, and workflow optimization.
omics-integration
Multi-omics data integration using MOFA+, DIABLO, and MixOmics for combining genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, metabolomics, and epigenomics datasets. Use for identifying shared variation across omics layers, building integrative biomarker models, and discovering cross-modal biological patterns. Best for paired…
proteomics-analysis
Mass spectrometry-based proteomics data analysis with pyteomics, spectrumutils, and MaxQuant/DIA-NN output processing. Use for peptide identification, protein quantification (LFQ, TMT, SILAC), differential expression, PTM analysis, and proteomics data visualization. Covers both DDA and DIA proteomics workflows.