Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add steph-dove/klaussy-agents --skill httpx-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/steph-dove/klaussy-agentsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/steph-dove/klaussy-agents/httpx-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/steph-dove/klaussy-agents/httpx-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/steph-dove/klaussy-agents/httpx-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/steph-dove/klaussy-agents/httpx-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/steph-dove/klaussy-agents/httpx-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00076 | $0.06995 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00038 | $0.03497 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00015 | $0.01399 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00700 |
Grade A, and why
httpx-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 302 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Adapted for Cline.
- This skill orchestrates parallel sub-agents using Claude's
Agenttool /subagent_typesyntax. Most coding agents now have their own parallel sub-agent or task mechanism (e.g. Cursor'sTask, Codex'sspawn_agent, Gemini subagents, Copilot'stask) — use yours and translate the wording. If it truly has none, apply each lens or angle yourself, sequentially, and combine the findings.
You are conducting a thorough PR review. Follow these phases in order.
Phase 1: Context Gathering
If master is missing or unset, default to dev if it exists, otherwise main.
The diff stat, full diff, commit log, and branch name below are pre-rendered as dynamic context — you do not need to fetch them yourself.
Diff stat
Run git diff --stat master...HEAD and use its output.
Commit log
Run git log master..HEAD --oneline and use its output.
Branch name
Run git branch --show-current and use its output.
What you still need to do
- Get the reviewable diff. Run
klaussy review-prep --base master. It returns the diff trimmed to reviewable files — lockfiles, generated/vendored trees, minified/binary blobs, and pure renames are dropped — followed by an Excluded from review manifest listing what it dropped and why. Use this trimmed diff as the diff for the rest of the review. If theklaussyCLI isn't on PATH (the command errors), fall back togit diff master...HEADfor the full untrimmed diff and proceed as before. Kept as a tool call rather than injected — even trimmed, diffs can be large. - Read the full file (not just the diff hunks) for every reviewable changed file — the files present in the trimmed diff, not the ones in the Excluded manifest. These are independent reads — issue them all in a single batch of parallel tool calls, not sequentially. The excluded files are deliberately out of scope: don't read or comment on them unless a finding in a reviewable file points directly at one.
- Count the total reviewable lines changed — use the
N changed line(s)figure in the review-prep summary line (on thegit difffallback, take the--stattotal but ignore any lockfile / generated / vendored / minified / binary files). - If the branch name contains a ticket reference (e.g. FEAT-1234), note it for context.
- Detect Architecture Decision Records / design docs. Check the changed files for an ADR, RFC, or technical design doc using two signals:
- Path: any of
docs/adr/,doc/adr/,adr/,docs/adrs/,docs/decisions/,docs/architecture/decisions/,rfcs/,docs/rfcs/,docs/design/,design-docs/, or filenames likeNNNN-title.md,ADR-NNNN-*.md,*.adr.md,*.rfc.md,*.design.md. - Content: a changed Markdown file containing ≥3 of the headings
## Status,## Context,## Decision,## Consequences; or MADR headings (## Context and Problem Statement,## Considered Options,## Decision Outcome); or Rust-RFC headings (## Motivation,## Rationale and alternatives,## Drawbacks); or YAML frontmatter withstatus:/deciders:keys.
- Path: any of
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 302 lines · 76 tokens per session scan A 53f2798c6186
httpx-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository steph-dove/klaussy-agents (16 stars, last pushed 14d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 76 tokens to every session and 6,995 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
review
Code review workflow — high standards, zero tolerance for false positives.
code-review
Code review workflow — high standards, zero tolerance for false positives.
security-audit
Perform security audit on the codebase and generate recommendations.
review-pr
Review a GitHub PR with security, performance, and quality checks.
find-simplifications
Use for a periodic repo-wide sweep of qwen-code for accumulated excess surface — dead components and files, orphaned locale keys, exports nothing consumes, added-then-removed scaffolding — filing candidates on a tracking issue and landing only what a maintainer has said yes to. Repo-wide and evidence-first; every…
swarm-pr-review
Run a graph-guided, tool-augmented PR review using context packing, parallel exploration, mandatory repository-agnostic risk-family coverage with dispatch scaled to diff size and risk, independent reviewer validation, critic challenge, and metrics writeback. Use for deep pull request review with low false-positive…