Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Stivi7/cyberpunk-context-runners --skill task-decompositiongit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Stivi7/cyberpunk-context-runnersWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/stivi7/cyberpunk-context-runners/task-decomposition)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/stivi7/cyberpunk-context-runners/task-decomposition"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/stivi7/cyberpunk-context-runners/task-decomposition/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/stivi7/cyberpunk-context-runners/task-decomposition"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/stivi7/cyberpunk-context-runners/task-decomposition.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00022 | $0.00340 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00136 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00068 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00034 |
Grade A, and why
task-decomposition scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Task Decomposition
Metadata
- Version: 1.0.0
- Triggers: Approved complex plan requiring multiple work units
- Allowed agents: Fragmenter
- Side effects: Creates work packets
When to Use
Use when multiple specialists or independently verifiable units are justified. Avoid fragmentation that creates more coordination than value.
Inputs
Approved plan, interface contracts, repository map, role capabilities, and verification strategy.
Procedure
- Build the dependency graph.
- Group cohesive changes that can be verified independently.
- Assign one owner and non-overlapping mutable
allowed_scopeper job. - Where paths or behavior interact, name an
integration_ownerand define a concreteintegration_contract. - Mark
parallel_safe: trueonly when dependencies are satisfied and mutable paths do not overlap. Worktree isolation does not make overlap safe; otherwise mark it false or define the integration owner and contract. - Produce complete work packets with acceptance, required skills,
dependencies,required_skills, and model profilemodel_profile.
Verification
Confirm no parallel_safe concurrent jobs own the same mutable surface without a named integration owner and concrete integration contract.
Output
Ordered work packets with this required shape, ownership map, dependency graph, concurrency decision, and integration order:
parallel_safe: true
dependencies: []
allowed_scope:
- path/to/owned/**
integration_owner: null
integration_contract: null
required_skills: []
model_profile: balanced
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago Changed · +11 lines f35387ecdb26
- 2mo ago First seen · 39 lines · 22 tokens per session scan A 36420ecc2cb5
task-decomposition is a skill published in the GitHub repository Stivi7/cyberpunk-context-runners (4 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 22 tokens to every session and 340 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
story-readiness
Checks whether a story is ready to implement: clear acceptance criteria, no open questions, valid ADR and dependencies. Use when the user asks if a story, or the sprint's stories, are ready to start or build.
atmos-config
Atmos root configuration: atmos.yaml discovery, precedence, deep merging, basepath, imports, minimal bootstrap, and routing to narrower Atmos skills.
workthreads
SpecStory Workthreads - a weekly work-thread rollup across a team's repos from SpecStory coding histories (any agent - Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Gemini, and more). It groups the window's sessions into threads of work per project and labels each new / open / recently closed, so a lead sees what shipped, what is still…
ring:mapping-feature-relationships
Mapping how features relate and phasing the work: categorizing PRD features, grouping them into domains, charting cross-feature journeys, dependencies, and integration points, and defining the binding Phases that plan.md mirrors one-to-one at Gate 7. Gate 2 of ring:planning-large-features; runs after…
remove
Remove a deployed framework or addon from the current workspace.
qa-project-bootstrap
Onboard a new QA engineer to an existing codebase, or audit an existing test architecture. Produces a 30-day ramp plan: codebase orientation, framework walkthrough, test architecture audit, mentorship pairing, and first-test guidance. Use when: "QA onboarding," "new tester," "ramp up," "test architecture audit,"…