timing-cli: Skill for Claude Code

.agents/skills/intake/SKILL.md

intake is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from sussdorff/timing-cli. It costs 27 tokens per session (1,085 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A workflow for turning notes, bug reports, or ideas into checked issues in a hosted issue tracker. It distinguishes creating an issue from carrying out the requested implementation.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to preserve the source, check history for duplicates, decide whether the request is author-only or includes implementation, and create one coherent issue.
Why use it?
It prevents vague, duplicate, or incorrectly scoped work orders and avoids implementing a request when the author only asked for an issue.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one. Also seen: reads .claude/ paths; installed under .agents/ (shared by several agents).

This is sussdorff/timing-cli's own configuration. It tells Claude Code and Codex how to work on timing-cli itself, so it is not a mod to install elsewhere. Copy it as a starting point and replace the rules that are about this project. Everything timing-cli configures →

Reuse

Borrowing it

Nothing to install: this file belongs to sussdorff/timing-cli. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.

Copy the file
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/sussdorff/timing-cli/main/.agents/skills/intake/SKILL.md
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/sussdorff/timing-cli

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for intake

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/sussdorff/timing-cli/intake/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/sussdorff/timing-cli/intake)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/sussdorff/timing-cli/intake"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/sussdorff/timing-cli/intake/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for intake

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/sussdorff/timing-cli/intake"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/sussdorff/timing-cli/intake.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 27 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,085 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00027 $0.01085
Opus 5.5 $0.00011 $0.00434
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00005 $0.00217
Haiku 4.5 $0.00003 $0.00109

Measured 24d ago against content hash cd8a3c954a66, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

intake scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 24d ago.

The scan reads SKILL.md. This mod also ships 4 executable files (scripts/issue_contract.py, scripts/issue_history.py, scripts/issue-author-check.py, …), listed below but not scanned — reading those needs a real analyzer, not pattern matching.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.agents/skills/intake/SKILL.md · 88 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 88 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Intake

Turn source notes into factory-ready hosted issues. The original request is the authority source: creating a work order and implementing it are different requested outcomes. This active session remains the original author; do not delegate authoring. Never run issue review automatically; review is a separate explicitly requested action.

The helpers ship in scripts/ of the installed intake skill root, not the marketplace source path. Resolve $INTAKE_ROOT local-first and fail closed if none exists: <repo>/.agents/skills/intake, <repo>/.claude/skills/intake, ~/.agents/skills/intake, ~/.claude/skills/intake. Never search the filesystem.

Establish the request

Read the provided source and preserve it in local .intake scratch space. With no source, ask for the missing input. Before extraction, read history.md and run scripts/issue_history.py for the target repository. Surface duplicate matches before creating another work order.

Classify the requested outcome by meaning:

  • author-only: create, file or track work; stop with the created issue.
  • author-and-execute: fix, build or deliver the requested change; continue after author-check and persistence.
  • unclear: ask only the question that decides between those outcomes.

Approve the boundary

One coherent outcome is one issue; implementation steps are internal work, not sub-issues. When there is exactly one candidate, a clear target and requested outcome, no duplicate choice and no competing boundary or Human Decision Gate, record approval_source: original_request. Do not ask for a routine confirmation.

Ask only when multiple plausible candidate boundaries remain, whether to append to the existing issue or create a new one is unresolved, the target repository is ambiguous, the requested outcome is unclear, or a product/architecture/policy choice is needed. Record approval_source: explicit_hitl for that decision. Never repeat approval already given for the same scope.

Read the full file on GitHub · 88 lines

Files

What ships with it

7 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 24d ago Changed · +8 lines cd8a3c954a66
  2. 1mo ago Changed · +6 lines 4baba3ace230
  3. 1mo ago First seen · 74 lines · 27 tokens per session scan A 08da016df736

Subscribe to this mod's changes

intake is a skill published in the GitHub repository sussdorff/timing-cli (1 stars, last pushed 10d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 27 tokens to every session and 1,085 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-24.