Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add swan-gtm/gtm-skills --skill meta-optimization-playbookgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/swan-gtm/gtm-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/swan-gtm/gtm-skills/meta-optimization-playbook)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/swan-gtm/gtm-skills/meta-optimization-playbook"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/swan-gtm/gtm-skills/meta-optimization-playbook/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/swan-gtm/gtm-skills/meta-optimization-playbook"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/swan-gtm/gtm-skills/meta-optimization-playbook.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00037 | $0.03268 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00018 | $0.01634 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00654 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00327 |
Grade A, and why
meta-optimization-playbook scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 325 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Meta Ads Optimization Playbook - B2B SaaS
What to do when things go right, wrong, or sideways. Decision trees, weekly cadence, thresholds, and benchmarks for managing B2B SaaS Meta accounts ($30K+ ACV).
Core Rule: Meta Thinks in Weeks, Not Days
Single-day or 3-day fluctuations are normal. Meta rotates audiences, tests delivery patterns, and adjusts. Never make decisions based on less than 7 days of data. Check results weekly, not daily.
The most common way to kill a winning campaign: Making changes every 2-4 days because a metric dipped. Let it run.
B2B SaaS Meta Benchmarks (2025-2026)
| Metric | Benchmark | Strong | Red Flag |
|---|---|---|---|
| CTR | 1.0-1.5% | 2.0%+ | < 0.8% |
| CPM | $10-20 | < $12 | > $25 |
| CPC (leads) | $1.50-2.50 | < $1.50 | > $3.50 |
| CPL (lead form) | $20-50 | < $25 | > $75 |
| Frequency (cold) | 1.5-3.0 | < 2.5 | > 4.0 |
| Frequency (retargeting) | 2.0-4.0 | < 3.0 | > 6.0 |
| MQL-to-SQL rate (Meta) | 5-10% | 15%+ | < 5% |
| Landing page CVR | 8-12% | 15%+ | < 5% |
Seasonal CPM swings:
- Q1 (Jan-Mar): Lowest CPMs - scale aggressively
- Q2 (Apr-Jun): Baseline (+10-20%)
- Q3 (Jul-Sep): Moderate increase (+15-25%)
- Q4 (Oct-Dec): Spike (+60-80%) - consider pausing or reducing B2B spend
Decision Tree 1: CPA Increasing
Trigger: CPA rises 20%+ above target for 2+ consecutive days.
CPA rising?
│
├─ Step 1: Check tracking
│ ├─ Pixel firing correctly? → If broken, fix immediately
│ ├─ CAPI sending events? → CAPI recovers 20-30% of lost conversions
│ └─ Attribution window correct? → B2B needs 7-day click minimum
│
├─ Step 2: Check frequency + creative fatigue
│ ├─ Frequency > 4.0? → Immediate creative refresh
│ ├─ CTR dropped 20%+ from baseline? → Creative fatigue, new concepts needed
│ └─ Frequency 3.0-4.0? → Warning zone, prepare replacement creative
│
├─ Step 3: Check learning phase
│ ├─ Made changes in last 7 days? → Learning phase reset. Wait.
│ ├─ Under 50 conversions this week? → Still in learning. Don't touch.
│ └─ Budget changed > 30%? → Learning phase reset. Roll back.
│
├─ Step 4: Check audience
│ ├─ Audience overlap between ad sets? → Consolidate or add exclusions
│ ├─ Audience saturated (small pool)? → Expand targeting or create lookalikes
│ └─ Irrelevant placements draining budget? → Check Audience Network, exclude if needed
│
├─ Step 5: Check landing page
│ ├─ Page load > 3 seconds? → 20% of clicks drop before page loads
│ ├─ Message mismatch between ad and LP? → Align copy
│ └─ Bounce rate spiked? → LP issue, not ad issue
│
└─ Step 6: External factors
├─ Q4 CPM spike? → Accept higher costs or reduce spend
├─ New competitor in auction? → CPM increase may be permanent
└─ Seasonal demand shift? → Adjust expectations
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 325 lines · 37 tokens per session scan A a7a64f72e36c
meta-optimization-playbook is a skill published in the GitHub repository swan-gtm/gtm-skills (153 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 37 tokens to every session and 3,268 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
ad-campaign-analyzer
Analyze cross-channel campaign data, quantify uncertainty, and propose evidence-labeled budget tests without overstating causality.
google-search-ads-builder
End-to-end Google Search Ads campaign builder. Performs deep keyword research (competitor SEO, review language mining, Reddit/HN community terminology, site audit), builds keyword architecture with funnel mapping and intent classification, creates ad group structure, generates headline/description variants, builds…
meta-ads-analyzer
Diagnose Meta Ads campaign performance and account gaps using Meta's actual system mechanics — including customer-journey coverage, Breakdown Effect, Learning Phase, Auction Overlap, Pacing, and Creative Fatigue. Use for performance diagnosis, account audits, full-funnel or TOF/MOF/BOF gap analysis, deciding what to…
ad-campaign-analyzer
Analyze ad campaign performance data (Google, Meta, LinkedIn) to identify what's working, what's wasting budget, and specific cut/scale/test recommendations. Runs statistical analysis, funnel diagnostics, and multi-channel budget reallocation with specific dollar-amount shift recommendations and scenario modeling.
competitor-ad-intelligence
Scrape competitor ads from Meta, TikTok, Google, and LinkedIn ad libraries, analyze creative patterns (hooks, formats, CTAs), reverse-engineer landing page funnels, and produce a strategic teardown with vulnerability analysis and counter-play recommendations. Use when you need to understand the competitive ad…
ad-angle-miner
Mine the highest-converting ad angles from customer reviews, Reddit complaints, support tickets, and competitor ads. Extracts actual pain language, competitor weaknesses, and outcome phrases that real buyers use. Outputs a ranked angle bank with proof quotes and recommended ad formats per angle.