won-deal-icp-finder

won-deal-icp-finder is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from swan-gtm/gtm-skills. It costs 158 tokens per session (1,473 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A sales-analysis workflow that studies deals your company actually won to define its ideal customer profile (ICP), meaning the kinds of customers most likely to pay. It then describes similar prospects to target.

In plain words
What is it for?
It is for reviewing closed deals, finding common customer traits, ranking revenue patterns, and building a look-alike prospect list.
Why use it?
It replaces an ICP based on hopes or assumptions with evidence from real revenue. This helps prevent sales and marketing from targeting markets that do not convert.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one.

Good fit It is for reviewing closed deals, finding common customer traits, ranking revenue patterns, and building a look-alike prospect list.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/swan-gtm/gtm-skills/won-deal-icp-finder
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add swan-gtm/gtm-skills --skill won-deal-icp-finder
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/swan-gtm/gtm-skills

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for won-deal-icp-finder

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/swan-gtm/gtm-skills/won-deal-icp-finder/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/swan-gtm/gtm-skills/won-deal-icp-finder)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/swan-gtm/gtm-skills/won-deal-icp-finder"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/swan-gtm/gtm-skills/won-deal-icp-finder/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for won-deal-icp-finder

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/swan-gtm/gtm-skills/won-deal-icp-finder"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/swan-gtm/gtm-skills/won-deal-icp-finder.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 158 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,473 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector pass 7 Sept 2026
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00158 $0.01473
Opus 5 $0.00079 $0.00737
Sonnet 5 $0.00032 $0.00295
Haiku 4.5 $0.00016 $0.00147

Measured 9d ago against content hash b805986ffa93, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-12, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

won-deal-icp-finder scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.

The scan reads SKILL.md. This mod also ships 1 executable file (scripts/analyze.py), listed below but not scanned — reading those needs a real analyzer, not pattern matching.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/erwann-lefevre/won-deal-icp-finder/SKILL.md · 70 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 70 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Applies when the ICP on the slide was written before the revenue arrived. Produces a proven profile, derived from deals that closed, plus the search criteria to find more of them.

Most stated ICPs are aspirational

Teams write their ICP at the start, from the market they want. Then they close deals, and the deals quietly disagree — smaller, in an adjacent vertical, in a country nobody targeted. Nobody rewrites the slide, so prospecting keeps aiming at the market that never paid. This skill re-derives the profile from the ledger instead of the plan.

Select on money, not on stage names

The first move is picking which deals count, and it is where this play usually breaks.

The obvious approach — filter on a "Closed Won" stage — assumes a stage that a surprising number of pipelines don't have, or don't use consistently, or spell in another language. When it silently matches nothing, the fallback is worse: pull the most recent deals instead, which are the newest and emptiest ones, and the analysis runs on rows with no value in them.

Select on deal value being populated, over the last twelve months. A won signal, where one genuinely exists, is a filter you add on top — not the thing you rely on. Read the CRM's own conventions before pulling anything: which field actually holds value (the standard amount field is often abandoned in favour of a custom ARR or ACV one), and whether a won status exists at all. If you can't tell, ask one specific question and stop. Guessing here doesn't produce a slightly-off answer, it produces a confident answer about empty rows. See references/deal-data-extraction.md for the field-discovery sequence, the CSV fallback, and how to keep the pull bounded.

Do the arithmetic in code

Sums, revenue shares, concentration ratios, and frequency rankings across a hundred-odd deals are exactly the work a language model gets quietly and unfixably wrong — and a wrong ranking sends a team after the wrong accounts for a quarter.

scripts/analyze.py does the counting. It parses both European and US amount formats, applies the window, excludes lost deals always, detects a won signal when present, aggregates revenue per company, and returns segments and source rankings as JSON. Run it, then reason over what it returns. It refuses rather than improvises when it can't find a value field, a company, or any deal in the window — a refusal is a question for the user, not a problem to code around. references/analysis-engine.md covers the flags, the output schema, and how to read each block.

Read the full file on GitHub · 70 lines

Files

What ships with it

5 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 9d ago First seen · 70 lines · 158 tokens per session scan A b805986ffa93

Subscribe to this mod's changes

won-deal-icp-finder is a skill published in the GitHub repository swan-gtm/gtm-skills (150 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 158 tokens to every session and 1,473 once invoked, about $0.0008 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

afrexai-lead-hunter

Enterprise-grade B2B lead generation, enrichment, scoring, and outreach sequencing for AI agents. Find ideal prospects, enrich with verified data, score against your ICP, and generate personalized outreach — all autonomously.

LeoYeAI/openclaw-master-skills · 50 tokens

reddit-leads

Discover B2B leads from Reddit using AI-powered lead scoring via reddapi.dev Leads API. Finds high-intent signals, scores them 0-100, and classifies by lead type (painpoint, solutionrequest, complaint, featurerequest, comparison). Perfect for competitor poaching, pain point discovery, and sales prospecting.

lignertys/reddit-research-skills · 71 tokens

lead-gen

Use when building and qualifying a prospect list before anyone reaches out — a falsifiable ICP, named accounts/contacts from Apollo/ZoomInfo/Clay, deduped against the CRM, tiered by fit+intent+engagement. NOT writing or sending the outreach (that is cold-outreach), NOT tracking the deal after first contact (that is…

ericrisco/rsc-harness · 77 tokens

Lead Research Assistant

Research company and contact information for sales outreach.

claude-office-skills/skills · 12 tokens

intent-outreach

Run a local research, enrichment, and outreach-drafting workflow over company domains with bring-your-own provider keys. Use when a user wants a reviewed SDR campaign or grounded cold-email drafts. Trigger with "run an outreach campaign", "prospect these companies", or "/intent-outreach".

jeremylongshore/intent-outreach · 61 tokens

sdr-agent

Autonomous SDR that monitors pipeline, drafts outreach, qualifies inbound, and manages follow-ups.

Autter-dev/agentic-sales-skills · 21 tokens