Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add sysprog21/frama-c-mcp --skill frama-c-proofreadergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/sysprog21/frama-c-mcpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/sysprog21/frama-c-mcp/frama-c-proofreader)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/sysprog21/frama-c-mcp/frama-c-proofreader"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/sysprog21/frama-c-mcp/frama-c-proofreader/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/sysprog21/frama-c-mcp/frama-c-proofreader"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/sysprog21/frama-c-mcp/frama-c-proofreader.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00082 | $0.00642 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00033 | $0.00257 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00016 | $0.00128 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00064 |
Grade A, and why
frama-c-proofreader scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 63 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Frama-C Proofreader
Workflow
Prefer the MCP server when it is available. Start with the install check and the shortest useful call:
self_check {}
reload_project {files, rte: true}
check {function?, timeout?}
If check reports alarms or non-valid goals, inspect the concrete payload before changing code:
get_wp_goals {want: ["alarms"], function?, status?}
get_wp_goals {want: ["investigation"], marker, depth}
get_wp_goals {function, status?}
context {function, want: ["current_annotations", "function_ast"]}
investigation takes the property marker off an alarm or goal row. A check
payload is not proved while incomplete[] has any entry; read each entry's
guidance before treating a valid goal as evidence.
Validate candidate ACSL with dry-run injection first:
inject_all_annotations {function, dry_run: true, annotations: [{kind, acsl, ...}]}
inject_all_annotations {function, annotations: [{kind, acsl, ...}]}
run_wp {functions: [function]}
Use run_e_acsl only as runtime evidence for concrete executions. If it is unavailable or fails to compile instrumentation, report that runtime checking was unavailable.
Read references/mcp-workflow.md for the full MCP call order, references/wp-output.md when interpreting WP goals, and references/e-acsl-output.md before making runtime-check claims.
Reporting
Always separate these outcomes:
- Environment failure: tool missing, prover not configured, instrumentation failed.
- Static proof gap: WP did not prove a goal; this is not automatically a bug.
- Runtime violation: E-ACSL found a violation on an executed path.
- Proven under assumptions: WP proved the generated goals for the ACSL and RTE configuration that actually ran.
Do not claim proof without tool output. Report exact goal names, proof counts, and whether rte: true or -wp-rte was used.
Before calling a function verified, run check {files, smoke: true} and confirm there is no SMOKE_TEST_FAILED: a contradictory requires or dead code makes every goal in scope provable, and only smoke tests notice.
What ships with it
8 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago Changed · +5 lines 0bdf2c277dbc
- 1mo ago First seen · 58 lines · 82 tokens per session scan A 13eef9289b7b
frama-c-proofreader is a skill published in the GitHub repository sysprog21/frama-c-mcp (35 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 82 tokens to every session and 642 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
cpp-coding-standards
C++ coding standards based on the C++ Core Guidelines (isocpp.github.io). Use when writing, reviewing, or refactoring C++ code to enforce modern, safe, and idiomatic practices.
cpp-coding-standards
C++ coding standards based on the C++ Core Guidelines (isocpp.github.io). Use when writing, reviewing, or refactoring C++ code to enforce modern, safe, and idiomatic practices.
qt-cpp-review
Invoke when the user asks to review, check, audit, or look over Qt6 C++ code — or suggest before committing. Runs deterministic linting (60+ rules) then six parallel deep- analysis agents covering model contracts, ownership, threading, API correctness, error handling, and performance. Reports only high-confidence…
ue-mcp-native-cpp
Use when writing or modifying native C++ UCLASSes in an Unreal project via ue-mcp. Covers createcppclass → writecppfile → livecodingcompile loop, when to use build vs Live Coding, and the addmoduledependency workflow. Pulls in any time the user asks to write a new native class, add a UPROPERTY, or implement a…
python-design-pattern
Python design patterns and anti-patterns. Use when designing new components, refactoring, reviewing code for common mistakes, choosing abstractions, or evaluating pull requests for structural issues like tight coupling, leaking internal types, or error handling problems.
qsyn-compilation
A C++ toolkit for transforming and optimizing quantum circuits, including representations based on ZX diagrams and tensors. It also provides circuit verification and a command-line interface.