agentmods.dev

literature-review

literature-review is a skill for Claude Code from TaewoooPark/MagLab. It costs 55 tokens per session (739 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A systematic literature review workflow for finding, screening, assessing, and synthesizing research papers. A systematic literature review uses recorded search and selection rules to make a research summary reproducible.

In plain words
What is it for?
Searching OpenAlex, arXiv, and Semantic Scholar for magnetism or spintronics papers, screening candidates, checking quality, and summarizing agreement or disagreement.
Why use it?
It structures the review process and requires DOI citations for factual claims, reducing unsupported statements and hidden selection choices.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: allowed-tools in frontmatter.

not rated 11repo 3mo ago A scan 55 tokens original MIT

Good fit Searching OpenAlex, arXiv, and Semantic Scholar for magnetism or spintronics papers, screening candidates, checking quality, and summarizing agreement or disagreement.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/taewooopark/maglab/literature-review
View source ↗ TaewoooPark/MagLab
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add TaewoooPark/MagLab --skill literature-review
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/TaewoooPark/MagLab

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for literature-review

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/taewooopark/maglab/literature-review/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/taewooopark/maglab/literature-review)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/taewooopark/maglab/literature-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/taewooopark/maglab/literature-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for literature-review

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/taewooopark/maglab/literature-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/taewooopark/maglab/literature-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 55 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 739 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00055 $0.00739
Opus 5.5 $0.00022 $0.00296
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00011 $0.00148
Haiku 4.5 $0.00006 $0.00074

Measured 2mo ago against content hash c45ea829866c, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

literature-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/literature-review/SKILL.md · 104 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 104 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

literature-review — Systematic literature review workflow skill

Overview

This skill implements a PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews)-based systematic review workflow aligned with MagLab research integrity principles (§3.3).

Core principles:

  • Every factual claim → DOI citation required
  • The LLM does not generate numerical values or material properties — citations from the paper text only
  • Consensus and controversy are stated transparently

Four-stage workflow

Stage 1: Search

  • Use the literature-search skill to generate a query family and collect candidates
  • Multiple sources: OpenAlex · arXiv · Semantic Scholar
  • Record search queries, dates, and filters (reproducibility)

Stage 2: Screening

Inclusion criteria:

  • Directly relevant to magnetism or spintronics
  • Contains experimental, theoretical, or simulation results
  • Available in English or with an English abstract

Exclusion criteria:

  • Retracted or corrected papers (retraction_status: "retracted")
  • Off-topic (may also be excluded at T3)
  • Failed DOI/metadata validation (verification_status: "failed")

Stage 3: Quality assessment

For each paper:

  • Methodological validity (measurement geometry · control group · statistics)
  • Reproducibility (parameters · data access)
  • Bias risk (sample selection · measurement uncertainty)

Record assessment results in the notes field.

Stage 4: Synthesis

Format: Paper-by-paper summary listing is prohibited — topic-centred synthesis is required.

Synthesis structure:

## [Topic/perspective]
[Evidence sentence (DOI citation format: [AuthorYear, DOI:xxx])]

### Consensus
[Common findings · methodology]

### Controversy
[Conflicting reports · method differences · interpretation differences]

### Gaps
[Open questions · unexplored areas]

Local-gap analysis

Compare local corpus with new search results to identify gaps:

  1. List of locally held papers (local-context-librarian results)
  2. Identify papers in new search results not in local corpus
  3. Generate coverage map by topic and method
  4. Report 3–5 priority gaps

Read the full file on GitHub · 104 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2mo ago First seen · 104 lines · 55 tokens per session scan A c45ea829866c

Subscribe to this mod's changes

literature-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository TaewoooPark/MagLab (11 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 55 tokens to every session and 739 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Researchai-for-scienceclidata-analysisinstrumentsllm-agentsmagnetism
Related

literature-review compared with skills from other repositories

literature-review next to 6 skills from other repositories
ModTypeStarsLast pushLicenceScanTokensWorks with
literature-reviewTaewoooPark/MagLabSkill113mo agoMITA55Claude Code
dos-dispatch-loopanthony-chaudhary/dos-kernelSkill2110d agoMITA49Claude Code
dos-goal-fleetanthony-chaudhary/dos-kernelSkill2110d agoMITA51Claude Code
dos-goal-gateanthony-chaudhary/dos-kernelSkill2110d agoMITA54Claude Code
dos-enforce-tuneanthony-chaudhary/dos-kernelSkill2110d agoMITA62Claude Code
dos-next-upanthony-chaudhary/dos-kernelSkill2110d agoMITA53Claude Code
dos-self-improveanthony-chaudhary/dos-kernelSkill2110d agoMITA56Claude Code