Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add TasiTech/tasi-harness --skill code-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/TasiTech/tasi-harnessWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/tasitech/tasi-harness/code-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/tasitech/tasi-harness/code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/tasitech/tasi-harness/code-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/tasitech/tasi-harness/code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/tasitech/tasi-harness/code-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00021 | $0.00141 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00056 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00028 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00014 |
Grade A, and why
code-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Code Review
Use this skill when asked to review a local project, inspect source files, or summarize risks in a patch.
Workflow
- Use
file_listto understand the workspace structure. - Read the smallest relevant files with
file_read. - When terminal is enabled, run focused commands such as
git diff --stat,npm test, or language-specific checks. - Report correctness bugs first, then security, reliability, maintainability, and style.
- Include exact file paths and concise suggested fixes.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 18 lines · 21 tokens per session scan A 475f2a115ee0
code-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository TasiTech/tasi-harness (11 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 21 tokens to every session and 141 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
developer_pr_prep
Prepare branches, diffs, tests, and GitHub PR text from a conversation's code folder.
developer_review
Code-review workflow for repositories in a conversation's code folder.
github-pr-workflow
Pull request lifecycle: create, review, merge, manage (gh CLI).
Architecture Reviewer
Architecture Reviewer delivers production-grade technical work with clear architecture, tests, maintainability, and operational awareness.
developer-anti-patterns-to-avoid
ANTI-PATTERNS TO AVOID — extracted from roles.json deepPrompt for developer.
developer-git-workflow
GIT WORKFLOW — extracted from roles.json deepPrompt for developer.