Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add terrylica/cc-skills --skill arxiv-source-first-paper-ingestgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/terrylica/cc-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/terrylica/cc-skills/arxiv-source-first-paper-ingest)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/terrylica/cc-skills/arxiv-source-first-paper-ingest"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/terrylica/cc-skills/arxiv-source-first-paper-ingest/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/terrylica/cc-skills/arxiv-source-first-paper-ingest"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/terrylica/cc-skills/arxiv-source-first-paper-ingest.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 1 finding, up to medium
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- medium Prompt Injection · line 77 Large whitespace padding was detected (a block of blank lines or a long run of spaces). This can push injected instructions below or to the right of the visible area so a human reviewer never sees them while the agent still reads them. Manual review of the hidden content is recommended.Fix: Remove the large whitespace padding (blank-line blocks or long space runs) and review any content hidden below or to the right of it. Keep skill files compact and reviewable so no instructions can be
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00156 | $0.01367 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00078 | $0.00683 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00031 | $0.00273 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00016 | $0.00137 |
Grade A, and why
arxiv-source-first-paper-ingest scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Makes network callslowCapability
Not a fault in itself. Listed so you know the mod talks to something, and to what.
curl -sSL -A "$UA" "https://export.arxiv.org/api/query?id_list=$ID" -o meta.xml How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 103 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
arXiv source-first paper ingest
Self-Evolving skill. If a step here fails or the tooling drifts, fix this file in the same change. The Post-Execution Reflection at the bottom says what to check.
The whole idea in one line: for an arXiv paper, the PDF is a rendering of something you can get losslessly, so do not read the rendering.
arxiv.org/e-print/<id> serves the authors' own LaTeX. It carries the exact formulas, their
\labels, and — critically — which formulas are stated propositions rather than intermediate
steps inside a proof. None of that survives into a PDF, so no vision model can recover it.
Measured on one real paper, OCR of the PDF reached 0.958 mean token similarity to the source and
only 49 % of its formulas compiled, against 98 % for the source. Full numbers, including a
systematic model defect that similarity cannot see, in
../../references/OCR-VERSUS-AUTHOR-LATEX-GROUND-TRUTH.md.
Step 1 — fetch the source, not the PDF
Identify yourself; arXiv asks for it and rate-limits anonymous bulk access.
ID=2605.00501
UA="your-project/1.0 (mailto:[email protected])"
mkdir -p /tmp/paper && cd /tmp/paper
curl -sSL -A "$UA" "https://export.arxiv.org/api/query?id_list=$ID" -o meta.xml
curl -sSL -A "$UA" "https://arxiv.org/e-print/$ID" -o eprint.tar.gz
mkdir -p src && tar xzf eprint.tar.gz -C src
If tar fails the e-print may be a single gzipped .tex — gunzip -c eprint.tar.gz > src/main.tex.
Papers withdrawn or submitted as PDF-only have no source; that is when you OCR, and the
unlimited-ocr plugin is the tool.
Step 2 — extract every display equation, with the structure that gives it authority
The tools live beside this file, under tools/ in this skill directory.
SKILL_DIR="$(dirname "$0")" # or the directory containing this SKILL.md
cargo run --release \
--manifest-path "$SKILL_DIR/tools/arxiv-latex-display-math-extractor/Cargo.toml" \
-- /tmp/paper/src > /tmp/paper/equations.json
What ships with it
7 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- tools/arxiv-latex-display-math-extractor/Cargo.lock 4.2 KB
- tools/arxiv-latex-display-math-extractor/Cargo.toml 315 B
- tools/arxiv-latex-display-math-extractor/src/main.rs 11 KB
- tools/compile_each_formula_with_real_tex_engine.ts 5.9 KB runs code
- tools/latex-math-validity-oracle/Cargo.lock 3.0 KB
- tools/latex-math-validity-oracle/Cargo.toml 250 B
- tools/latex-math-validity-oracle/src/main.rs 2.4 KB
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 103 lines · 156 tokens per session scan A 6bec80e59461
arxiv-source-first-paper-ingest is a skill published in the GitHub repository terrylica/cc-skills (72 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 156 tokens to every session and 1,367 once invoked, about $0.0008 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (makes network calls). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
email-systems
Transactional email (Resend, SendGrid, SES), templates (React Email, MJML), deliverability (SPF/DKIM/DMARC), and inboxing best practices. Use when building email infrastructure, designing templates, or troubleshooting deliverability.
generic-design-system
Complete design system reference for any project - colors, typography, spacing, components, animations. Adapts to project theme and tech stack. Use when implementing UI, choosing colors, creating animations, or ensuring brand consistency. For new design systems, use ui-research skill first.
debug-systematic
Systematic 4-phase debugging methodology for complex, intermittent, or mysterious issues. Use when investigating bugs, race conditions, or unexplained failures.
embedded-iot
Embedded systems firmware, microcontrollers (ESP32, STM32, Arduino, Raspberry Pi), RTOS (FreeRTOS, Zephyr), IoT protocols (MQTT, CoAP, BLE), bare-metal C/C++, and hardware peripheral interfaces (I2C, SPI, UART, GPIO). Use when developing firmware, working with microcontrollers, or building IoT devices.
generic-code-reviewer
Review code for bugs, security vulnerabilities, performance issues, accessibility gaps, and CLAUDE.md workflow compliance. Supports any tech stack - HTML/CSS/JS, React, TypeScript, Node.js, Python, NestJS, Next.js, and more. Use when completing features, before commits, or reviewing pull requests.
fable-scope-discipline
Use when implementing any change in existing code — when tempted to clean up nearby code, add unrequested validation or options, fix something "arguably in scope", or when the diff is growing past what was asked.