Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add TheQtCompanyRnD/agent-skills --skill qt-cpp-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/TheQtCompanyRnD/agent-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/theqtcompanyrnd/agent-skills/qt-cpp-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/theqtcompanyrnd/agent-skills/qt-cpp-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/theqtcompanyrnd/agent-skills/qt-cpp-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/theqtcompanyrnd/agent-skills/qt-cpp-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/theqtcompanyrnd/agent-skills/qt-cpp-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- Socket pass
- Snyk pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00086 | $0.04142 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00043 | $0.02071 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00017 | $0.00828 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00414 |
Grade A, and why
qt-cpp-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What ships with it
7 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 463 lines · 86 tokens per session scan A ca52fa54c1ef
qt-cpp-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository TheQtCompanyRnD/agent-skills (418 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 86 tokens to every session and 4,142 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
qt-cpp-review
Invoke when the user asks to review, check, audit, or look over Qt6 C++ code — or suggest before committing. Runs deterministic linting (60+ rules) then six parallel deep- analysis agents covering model contracts, ownership, threading, API correctness, error handling, and performance. Reports only high-confidence…
java-spring-code-review
Reviews Java and Spring Boot code changes with a findings-first workflow focused on behavioral regressions, contract drift, transaction and data-access risks, scheduler or async timing issues, security flaws, and performance problems. Use when the user asks to review code, inspect a PR or diff, check whether a backend…
cpp-coding-standards
C++ coding standards based on the C++ Core Guidelines (isocpp.github.io). Use when writing, reviewing, or refactoring C++ code to enforce modern, safe, and idiomatic practices.
qt-cpp-docs
Generates standalone Markdown reference documentation for any Qt/C++ source files — Qt Widgets classes, Qt Quick backends, Qt/C++ modules, plain C++ utilities, structs, free-function headers, and entry points like main.cpp. Use this skill to document any .h or .cpp file: Qt classes, plain C++ code, utility helpers, or…
code-review-csharp
Perform structured code reviews of C# source code covering naming conventions, performance, security, readability, and .NET best practices. Trigger phrases include "review this C# code", "check my C# for best practices", "analyze this C# class", "find issues in my C# code".
sapcc-review
Gold-standard SAP CC Go code review: 10 parallel domain specialists.