Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add tikalk/adlc-team-skills --skill architect-analyzegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/tikalk/adlc-team-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/tikalk/adlc-team-skills/architect-analyze)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/tikalk/adlc-team-skills/architect-analyze"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/tikalk/adlc-team-skills/architect-analyze/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/tikalk/adlc-team-skills/architect-analyze"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/tikalk/adlc-team-skills/architect-analyze.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 2 findings, up to high
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- high Memory Poisoning · line 152 Skill manipulates agent memory, state, or stored context. Memory corruption can alter personality, override safety rules, or cause unpredictable behavior.Fix: Protect agent memory and state from modification by untrusted content. Use read-only memory for critical instructions and validate all state changes.
- high Memory Poisoning · line 264 Skill manipulates agent memory, state, or stored context. Memory corruption can alter personality, override safety rules, or cause unpredictable behavior.Fix: Protect agent memory and state from modification by untrusted content. Use read-only memory for critical instructions and validate all state changes.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00038 | $0.04609 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00015 | $0.01844 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00922 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00461 |
Grade A, and why
architect-analyze scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 476 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
architect-analyze
What this skill does
Performs a read-only architecture consistency analysis between ADRs (Architecture Decision Records) and AD (Architecture Description). It identifies discrepancies, quality issues, and gaps without modifying any files.
Key analysis dimensions:
- ADR Quality — Completeness, clarity, and standards compliance
- ADR to AD Consistency — Bidirectional drift detection
- Internal Consistency — Cross-artifact coherence
- Staleness Detection — Outdated references and placeholders
- Mermaid Syntax — Deterministic validity check over diagram blocks, with location + suggested patch (the mermaid detection pass)
This skill validates architecture artifacts for consistency, completeness, and quality.
When to use
- After
/architect-implement— Validate generated AD.md - After
/architect-clarify— Verify ADR refinements - Before feature development — Ensure architecture is solid
- During architecture review — Quality gate for architecture docs
- Periodically — Detect drift as the codebase evolves
Do not use when no architecture artifacts exist; use /architect-init or /architect-specify first. Do not use to create architecture — this is analysis-only.
Process
User Input
Consider the user input before proceeding (if not empty):
$ARGUMENTS
Examples:
"system"— Focus on root-level AD.md and adr/ directory only"feature auth"— Focus on specific feature architecture"adrs"— Focus on ADR quality and inter-ADR consistency"views"— Focus on AD.md view completeness and internal consistency- Empty input — Full analysis of all architecture artifacts
Goal
Perform read-only architecture consistency analysis. Identify discrepancies, quality issues, and gaps without modifying any files.
Operating Constraints
STRICTLY READ-ONLY: Do not modify any files. Output a structured analysis report. Offer remediation suggestions (user must explicitly approve before any follow-up editing commands would be invoked manually).
What ships with it
7 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- scripts/bash/ascii-generator.sh 18 KB runs code
- scripts/bash/common.sh 3.1 KB runs code
- scripts/bash/mermaid-generator.sh 8.9 KB runs code
- scripts/bash/setup-architect.sh 54 KB runs code
- scripts/powershell/ASCII-Generator.ps1 18 KB runs code
- scripts/powershell/Mermaid-Generator.ps1 8.9 KB runs code
- scripts/powershell/setup-architect.ps1 49 KB runs code
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago Changed · +10 lines 2b212765f6ec
- 25d ago Changed 3b6ad2881f73
- 26d ago Changed deb0726f12a9
- 1mo ago Changed · -5 tokens per session 0daa51884ae8
- 1mo ago Changed 3c7544838654
- 1mo ago First seen · 466 lines · 43 tokens per session scan A 48aa43048ddb
architect-analyze is a skill published in the GitHub repository tikalk/adlc-team-skills (143 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 38 tokens to every session and 4,609 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
find-simplifications
Use for a periodic repo-wide sweep of qwen-code for accumulated excess surface — dead components and files, orphaned locale keys, exports nothing consumes, added-then-removed scaffolding — filing candidates on a tracking issue and landing only what a maintainer has said yes to. Repo-wide and evidence-first; every…
cross-model-review
A second-opinion code review that asks a different AI model to independently inspect a change, then compares both reviews. It focuses on logic, security, consistency, and omissions.
swarm-pr-review
Run a graph-guided, tool-augmented PR review using context packing, parallel exploration, mandatory repository-agnostic risk-family coverage with dispatch scaled to diff size and risk, independent reviewer validation, critic challenge, and metrics writeback. Use for deep pull request review with low false-positive…
pre-landing-review
Pre-landing PR review. Analyzes diff against the base branch for SQL safety, LLM trust boundary violations, conditional side effects, and other structural issues. Use when explicitly asked for the specialized pre-landing workflow. Product /review requests are handled by OpenBitFun's unified Review mechanism instead.…
include-test-files-that-assert-on-behavior-being-changed-in-decl
When delegating a task affected by this skill, include.
pr-review-canvas
Create a OpenBitFun Canvas for reviewing a pull request, branch diff, or change set with Cursor-style diff cards, review maps, risk callouts, and focused reviewer flow. Use when the user asks for a PR review canvas, diff walkthrough, change-set overview, or visual review summary.