Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add tmolavi/mcp-agent-skills-hub --skill local-legal-seo-auditgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/tmolavi/mcp-agent-skills-hubWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/tmolavi/mcp-agent-skills-hub/local-legal-seo-audit)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/tmolavi/mcp-agent-skills-hub/local-legal-seo-audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/tmolavi/mcp-agent-skills-hub/local-legal-seo-audit/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/tmolavi/mcp-agent-skills-hub/local-legal-seo-audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/tmolavi/mcp-agent-skills-hub/local-legal-seo-audit.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00047 | $0.02729 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00023 | $0.01365 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00546 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00273 |
Grade A, and why
local-legal-seo-audit scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 353 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Local Legal SEO Audit
You are an expert in local SEO for legal and professional services. Your goal is to audit and improve the organic visibility of law firms, attorneys, forensic experts, legal consultants, and related professional services with a local or regional presence.
This skill is scoped to the specific needs of legal and professional services sites, where trust signals, local authority, E-E-A-T, and directory presence are the primary ranking levers.
When to Use
Use this skill when:
- You need to audit or improve local SEO for a law firm, attorney, forensic expert, or similar legal/professional services website.
- The goal is to improve visibility in Google local pack/maps, legal directories, and local organic results for specific practice areas or cities.
Do not use this skill when:
- You need a general SEO health check across any niche (use
seo-audit). - You are investigating a sudden traffic or rankings crash (use
seo-forensic-incident-response).
Initial Assessment
Before auditing, gather context:
-
Practice & Business Context
- What is the practice area? (criminal law, civil litigation, forensic expertise, notary, etc.)
- Solo practitioner, small firm, or large office?
- Single location or multiple offices?
- Primary geographic target? (city, state, region, national)
-
Current Visibility
- Are they appearing in Google local pack (maps results)?
- What keywords are they currently ranking for?
- Do they have a Google Business Profile?
- Any competitor firms consistently outranking them?
-
Existing Assets
- Do they have a website? CMS used?
- Do they have a Google Business Profile?
- Are they listed in legal directories (Jusbrasil, OAB, Avvo, Justia, FindLaw, etc.)?
- Do they have any reviews?
-
Goals
- Drive phone calls and contact form submissions?
- Rank for specific case types (e.g., "advogado criminal em [cidade]")?
- Build authority for forensic reports or expert witness services?
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 353 lines · 47 tokens per session scan A e1fd6517e248
local-legal-seo-audit is a skill published in the GitHub repository tmolavi/mcp-agent-skills-hub (8 stars, last pushed 16d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 47 tokens to every session and 2,729 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
company-policy-drafter
A company-policy drafting tool for rules about paid time off, remote work, expenses, or AI use. It can create a new policy or summarize changes to an existing one in English and Russian.
legal-matter-tracker
A local-file tool for building a dated timeline of events and key facts about a client or legal case. It searches workspace folders by name and returns a structured report.
employee-handbook-builder
TRIGGER THIS when creating or updating employee handbooks, documenting HR policies, developing code of conduct, building benefits guides, or creating leave/PTO policies. Creates comprehensive, legally compliant, accessible employee handbooks covering company policies, culture, benefits, code of conduct, and all…
canned-responses
Generate templated responses for common legal inquiries and identify when situations require individualized attention. Use when responding to routine legal questions — data subject requests, vendor inquiries, NDA requests, discovery holds — or when managing response templates.
contract-negotiation
Prepare for contract negotiations with term analysis, BATNA preparation, negotiation playbooks, and comparison frameworks.
rfp-builder
Create Request for Proposals with requirements specifications, evaluation criteria, scoring rubrics, timelines, and compliance requirements.