Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add tobihagemann/turbo --skill draft-plangit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/tobihagemann/turboWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/tobihagemann/turbo/draft-plan)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/tobihagemann/turbo/draft-plan"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/tobihagemann/turbo/draft-plan/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/tobihagemann/turbo/draft-plan"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/tobihagemann/turbo/draft-plan.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 1 finding, up to medium
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- medium Rogue Agent · line 12 Skill establishes unauthorized persistence across sessions via cron jobs, startup scripts, or state files. Session persistence allows an attacker to maintain access beyond the current interaction.Fix: Remove any persistence mechanisms (cron jobs, startup scripts, state files). Skills should not maintain state across sessions without explicit user consent.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00062 | $0.03272 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00031 | $0.01636 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00654 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00327 |
Grade A, and why
draft-plan scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 204 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Draft Plan
Produce an implementation plan at .turbo/plans/<slug>.md. Capture the task, survey patterns, escalate decisions, discuss, and draft.
Task Tracking
Use TaskCreate to create a task for each step:
- Capture the task and pick a slug
- Run
/survey-patternsskill - Consult task-specific skills and docs
- Escalate product decisions
- Deep-dive discussion
- Draft and write the plan file
- Present summary and finalize
Step 1: Capture the Task and Pick a Slug
Absorb the user's request without interrupting. Restate the goal in one or two sentences and confirm.
Generate a slug for the plan file from the task title:
- Lowercase
- Replace non-alphanumeric characters with hyphens
- Collapse consecutive hyphens
- Trim leading and trailing hyphens
- Truncate to 40 characters at a word boundary
Example: "Add a caching layer to the image pipeline" → add-a-caching-layer-to-the-image-pipeline.
If .turbo/plans/<slug>.md already exists, append -2, -3, etc. until the path is free. Do not overwrite.
The user may pass an explicit slug or output path in their request (e.g., "draft plan as auth-rewrite"). If so, honor it. If .turbo/plans/<slug>.md exists in that case, use AskUserQuestion to ask whether to overwrite, append a numeric suffix, or pick a different slug.
A path to a file that already exists is background input rather than an output destination. Treat it as the output path only when the request says so explicitly.
State the chosen slug and the resulting plan path before continuing.
Background Document as Input
If a path to a background document is passed as input (a design doc, an issue, a written proposal), treat it as the source of truth for product decisions and discussion areas. Read it, then:
- In Step 4, skip escalation for any product decision the document resolves. Only escalate questions it did not answer.
- In Step 5, skip deep-dive areas the document covers. Only discuss areas it did not address.
- Confirm the deployment's bounds with the user even when the document states them, rather than carrying them over as settled.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago Changed 4ab41f40a434
- 9d ago First seen · 204 lines · 62 tokens per session scan A 5877e5f595c8
draft-plan is a skill published in the GitHub repository tobihagemann/turbo (402 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 62 tokens to every session and 3,272 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
my-adhd-caveman
Self-contained output mode: ADHD actable structure (action first, numbered steps, one next action, one-line progress) plus caveman diction (drop fluff/articles, fragments, fewer tokens). Use when the user says "adhd-caveman", "my-adhd-caveman", or invokes /my-adhd-caveman. Needs no other skills.
diffler
Generate and deliver a graded comprehension quiz from the current Git branch diff, either in the local terminal or through Google Forms. Use when a user asks to prove, test, or verify understanding of branch changes, a feature branch, or a pull request.
plan-ceo-review
CEO/founder-mode plan review. Rethink the problem, find the 10-star product, challenge premises, expand scope when it creates a better product. Three modes: SCOPE EXPANSION (dream big), HOLD SCOPE (maximum rigor), SCOPE REDUCTION (strip to essentials). Originally from Garry Tan's gstack…
master
Turn reference docs into active mastery through retrieval practice, case binding, and scenario simulation. Combines Skycak (learning science) and Chin (expertise acceleration) frameworks. Use when you want to deeply learn material, not just read it.
upskilling-coach
Expert coach for learning, mastering, and upskilling in any domain. Use when the user wants to learn, master, improve, upskill, get better at, or get coached on any topic. Helps build consistent practice habits, identify prerequisites, design efficient learning loops, avoid common pitfalls, maintain discipline, and…
agentic-review
Deep multi-agent code review for local changes. Inspired by AmpCode's agentic review. Use when you want comprehensive analysis of staged changes, unstaged changes, specific commits, or branch differences. Spawns parallel specialized agents (security, performance, patterns, architecture) and synthesizes actionable…