Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add tomsej/pi-ext --skill wf-quickgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/tomsej/pi-extWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/tomsej/pi-ext/wf-quick)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/tomsej/pi-ext/wf-quick"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/tomsej/pi-ext/wf-quick/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/tomsej/pi-ext/wf-quick"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/tomsej/pi-ext/wf-quick.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 2 findings, up to medium
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- medium Agent Snooping · line 15 Skill enumerates or reads other installed skills. Access to other skills' SKILL.md files or the skills directory reveals prompt instructions, capabilities, and secrets that should be invisible to peer skills.Fix: Remove all code or instructions that list or read other skills' files or directories. Skills should operate independently; cross-skill access is a privilege escalation.
- medium Agent Snooping · line 43 Skill enumerates or reads other installed skills. Access to other skills' SKILL.md files or the skills directory reveals prompt instructions, capabilities, and secrets that should be invisible to peer skills.Fix: Remove all code or instructions that list or read other skills' files or directories. Skills should operate independently; cross-skill access is a privilege escalation.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00075 | $0.00735 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00030 | $0.00294 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00015 | $0.00147 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00073 |
Grade A, and why
wf-quick scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
/wf-quick — malý task bez ceremonie
Celý cyklus v TÉHLE session — žádný soubor kontraktu, žádný worktree, žádný
wf-gate. Chat je kontrakt. Endgame: draft PR + explain. Nikdy gh pr merge.
Eskalační ventil
Překročí-li task kterýkoli limit, zastav a napiš „tohle je /wf case" —
kontrakt vytvoří skill wf z ~/Workspace/pi-ext/skills/wf/SKILL.md:
- víc než 3 akceptační kritéria,
- víc než ~5 dotčených souborů,
- migrace, destruktivní operace, auth/security, nové veřejné API.
Ventil platí i v průběhu — když task přeroste pod rukama, zastav a eskaluj, nedojížděj ho quick režimem.
Postup
- Kritéria: navrhni 1–3 pozorovatelná kritéria (styl jako ve /wf) a nech si je v chatu odsouhlasit — bez souhlasu nezačínej.
- Branch: nová branch z čisté default branche (
git switch -c <type>/<slug>). Jsi-li na feature branchi s rozdělanou prací, zeptej se. - Implementace: načti skill
tdd— jeden failing test na kritérium → minimální kód → refactor na zeleném. Test nikdy neoslabuj. - Review (risk-based): default žádné. Sahá-li změna na auth/vstupy/data
nebo o to uživatel požádá → jeden read-only reviewer přes
subagent_spawns jiným modelem nebo harnessem, než má tahle session — cross-model, jinak nemá cenu. Nálezy jsou tvrzení (severita +file:line); ověř je proti kódu, legitimní oprav sám. - Check: existující quick příkaz projektu (
npm test,make check…) — žádný nový gate skript. - Ship: commit dle skillu
commit;gh pr create --draft, titulek Conventional Commits, popis anglicky a krátce: Why / What changed / Verification (bez wf-spec markeru — quick nemá spec). - Explain: načti skill
wf-explainz~/Workspace/pi-ext/skills/wf-explain/SKILL.mdstandalone s ref range<target>...HEAD— zapíše~/Workspace/specs/<projekt>/YYYY-MM-DD-<slug>/explanation.md.
Report (česky)
Kritéria → testy, review (kdo / žádné a proč), výsledek checku, PR link, cesta k explain dokumentu.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 51 lines · 75 tokens per session scan A adcd4d94e81f
wf-quick is a skill published in the GitHub repository tomsej/pi-ext (79 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 75 tokens to every session and 735 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
workflow-patterns
Use this skill when implementing tasks according to Conductor's TDD workflow, handling phase checkpoints, managing git commits for tasks, or understanding the verification protocol.
cmux-testing
Choose scoped cmux verification, add behavioral tests, and validate Swift test targets and wiring. Use when adding tests or deciding what local/CI evidence a change needs.
nw-quality-framework
Quality gates - 11 commit readiness gates, build/test protocol, validation checkpoints, and quality metrics.
gh-issue
Fetch GitHub issue, create branch, plan and implement with TDD, then open PR.
strict-tdd
Strict RED->GREEN->REFACTOR test-driven development with enforcement. Never write production code before a failing test. Atomic commits per TDD cycle.
loom-builder-pr
This document covers PR creation, test output handling, and quality requirements for the Builder role. For the core builder workflow, see builder.md.