Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add tomzx/agents --skill sprint-retrogit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/tomzx/agentsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/tomzx/agents/sprint-retro)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/tomzx/agents/sprint-retro"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/tomzx/agents/sprint-retro/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/tomzx/agents/sprint-retro"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/tomzx/agents/sprint-retro.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00047 | $0.00984 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00019 | $0.00394 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00197 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00098 |
Grade A, and why
sprint-retro scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 102 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
BASE_DIR=!~/.agents/scripts/get-env NOTES_DIR
TODAY=!date +%Y-%m-%d
YEAR=!date +%Y
MONTH=!date +%m
DAY=!date +%d
Generate Sprint Retrospective
Produces a structured sprint retrospective by reviewing the past two weeks of daily notes, GitHub activity, and Slack activity.
Prerequisites
- Slack MCP server connected and authenticated
ghCLI authenticatedNOTES_DIRenvironment variable set (resolved via~/.agents/scripts/get-env NOTES_DIR)~/.agents/scripts/get-envutility available- At least one week of daily notes present in
{BASE_DIR}
Steps
1. Gather Data
- Resolve the notes directory:
~/.agents/scripts/get-env NOTES_DIR - Read all daily note files from the past two weeks within
{BASE_DIR}(.github.md,.slack.md,.overall.md,.timeline.md, weekly summaries). - Fetch recent GitHub activity (PRs opened, reviewed, merged; issues closed) for the past two weeks using
gh. - Fetch recent Slack activity via the Slack MCP server for context on collaboration, blockers, and thanks.
2. Analyze and Categorize
Review all gathered data and categorize findings into the five retrospective sections below.
3. Write Retrospective
Write the output to {BASE_DIR}/{YEAR}/{MONTH}/{DAY}.sprint-retro.md using this template:
# Sprint Retrospective ({TODAY})
## Kudos
People who helped, collaborated well, or went above and beyond.
- **[Person]**: [What they did and why it mattered]
## Went Well
Things that worked effectively this sprint.
- [Item with brief supporting evidence]
## Could Have Gone Better
Things that did not go as smoothly as hoped.
- [Item with brief explanation of what happened]
## What Would I Have Needed to Move Faster This Sprint?
Blockers, missing context, tooling gaps, or process friction that slowed progress.
- [Item with specific suggestion if possible]
## Action Items
Concrete next steps to improve the next sprint, derived from the sections above.
- [ ] [Actionable item with owner if applicable]
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 102 lines · 47 tokens per session scan A 965ac81055f3
sprint-retro is a skill published in the GitHub repository tomzx/agents (13 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 47 tokens to every session and 984 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
story-readiness
Checks whether a story is ready to implement: clear acceptance criteria, no open questions, valid ADR and dependencies. Use when the user asks if a story, or the sprint's stories, are ready to start or build.
recipe-create-meet-space
Create a Google Meet meeting space and share the join link.
workthreads
SpecStory Workthreads - a weekly work-thread rollup across a team's repos from SpecStory coding histories (any agent - Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Gemini, and more). It groups the window's sessions into threads of work per project and labels each new / open / recently closed, so a lead sees what shipped, what is still…
atmos-config
Atmos root configuration: atmos.yaml discovery, precedence, deep merging, basepath, imports, minimal bootstrap, and routing to narrower Atmos skills.
qa-project-bootstrap
Onboard a new QA engineer to an existing codebase, or audit an existing test architecture. Produces a 30-day ramp plan: codebase orientation, framework walkthrough, test architecture audit, mentorship pairing, and first-test guidance. Use when: "QA onboarding," "new tester," "ramp up," "test architecture audit,"…
remove
Remove a deployed framework or addon from the current workspace.