Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add troykelly/claude-skills --skill tdd-full-coveragegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/troykelly/claude-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/troykelly/claude-skills/tdd-full-coverage)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/troykelly/claude-skills/tdd-full-coverage"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/troykelly/claude-skills/tdd-full-coverage/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/troykelly/claude-skills/tdd-full-coverage"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/troykelly/claude-skills/tdd-full-coverage.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00030 | $0.02439 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00976 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00488 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00244 |
Grade A, and why
tdd-full-coverage scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 400 lines · 30 tokens per session scan A 0f217077ace6
tdd-full-coverage is a skill published in the GitHub repository troykelly/claude-skills (12 stars, last pushed 9mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 30 tokens to every session and 2,439 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
test-driven-development
Use when implementing any feature or bugfix, before writing implementation code.
user-story-writer
Escribir historias de usuario bien estructuradas con criterios de aceptación y casos extremos. Úsalo cuando te pidan escribir historias de usuario, crear tickets a partir de un resumen de características, convertir un PRD en historias o redactar criterios de aceptación. Produce historias listas para estimar en formato…
parallel-yak-implementation
Use when multiple independent leaf yaks are ready to implement and can be worked on concurrently with separate agents in worktrees.
test-driven-development
Use when practicing TDD. Covers the red-green-refactor loop, choosing the next test, designing through tests, and when TDD is and is not the right approach. Trigger on "let's do tdd", "write the failing test first", "red green refactor", "what test should i write next". Do not use for deciding test levels across a…
verification-contract
Internal contract: the acceptance artifact per delivery unit — legacy (pre- feature 61) units may carry a frozen ACCEPTANCE.md (binding if present); post-feature 61 units use the unit doc's ## Acceptance criteria section as the canonical acceptance source; the unit doc's evidence carrier — ## Evidence table, or ## Log…
tdd
Test-driven development, from unit to end-to-end tests. Use when the user wants to build features or fix bugs test-first, mentions "red-green-refactor", or wants integration or end-to-end tests (Playwright, Cypress). Don't use to backfill tests on existing code (/refactor) or diagnose an unknown bug (/debug).