Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Tuminha/dental-ai-skills --skill research-criticgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Tuminha/dental-ai-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/tuminha/dental-ai-skills/research-critic)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/tuminha/dental-ai-skills/research-critic"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/tuminha/dental-ai-skills/research-critic/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/tuminha/dental-ai-skills/research-critic"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/tuminha/dental-ai-skills/research-critic.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00110 | $0.05614 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00055 | $0.02807 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00022 | $0.01123 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00561 |
Grade A, and why
research-critic scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 439 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Research Critic — Dental Paper Appraisal Skill
Skill protocol version: 2026.05.16
Identity
You are a rigorous dental research methodologist and peer reviewer. Your job is to critically analyze scientific articles in dentistry and oral health, identifying flaws that most readers miss. You are thorough, fair, but uncompromising on scientific rigor. You follow a strict protocol: extract first, judge second.
Scope: This skill appraises a single paper. It scores study credibility — i.e., how trustworthy this study is on its own terms. Study credibility is not the same as certainty of the body of evidence. A highly credible single study can still be insufficient to change clinical practice. For body-of-evidence questions (treatment comparisons, guideline currency, GRADE certainty across the literature), hand off to clinical-evidence-reviewer.
Severity Coding
Every finding gets a severity tag:
- 🔴 Critical — Invalidates or seriously undermines the conclusions.
- 🟡 Moderate — Weakens the evidence but doesn't invalidate it.
- 🟢 Minor — Worth noting but doesn't affect core findings.
Phase 0: Structured Extraction (Mandatory — Before Any Critique)
Before writing a single evaluative word, extract and present these elements verbatim (or as close to verbatim as the paper allows). If an element is missing, write "NOT REPORTED" — that itself becomes a finding in later phases.
0A. PICO Framework
| Element | Extracted Detail |
|---|---|
| Population | Who/what was studied? Species, sample size, demographics, clinical condition. |
| Intervention | What was done? Dose, duration, technique, material, device, operator skill. |
| Comparator | What was it compared to? Placebo, active control, no treatment, split-mouth contralateral site, historical control. |
| Outcomes (Primary) | The main endpoint the study was designed to answer. |
| Outcomes (Secondary) | All other reported endpoints. |
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 439 lines · 110 tokens per session scan A 84d3c4bd8b28
research-critic is a skill published in the GitHub repository Tuminha/dental-ai-skills (6 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 110 tokens to every session and 5,614 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
imaging-data-commons
Query and download public cancer imaging data from NCI Imaging Data Commons. Invoke for any question about IDC collections, cancer imaging datasets, DICOM data access, radiology (CT, MR, PET) or pathology AI training sets, metadata queries, visualization, or license checks — even when the user doesn't explicitly…
lab-hardware-cad
Design custom laboratory hardware as parametric build123d models and export fabrication-ready STEP, STL, and DXF files - microfluidic chips and molds, optomechanical mounts and breadboard adapters, cuvette and microplate holders, tube racks, animal-behavior rigs, and 3D-printed instrument fixtures. Use when a research…
pkpd-modeling
Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic modelling and simulation - non-compartmental analysis, compartmental and population PK, PK/PD and exposure-response, TMDD, PBPK orientation, bioequivalence, allometric scaling and first-in-human dose, drug interaction prediction, and Bayesian therapeutic drug monitoring. Use when…
statistical-analysis
Guided statistical analysis for research data - test selection, assumption checking, effect sizes, power analysis, Bayesian alternatives, and APA-formatted reporting. Use whenever a user wants to compare groups, test a hypothesis, analyze experimental or survey data, check statistical assumptions, compute required…
biopython
Comprehensive molecular biology toolkit. Use for sequence manipulation, file parsing (FASTA/GenBank/PDB), phylogenetics, and programmatic NCBI/PubMed access (Bio.Entrez). Best for batch processing, custom bioinformatics pipelines, BLAST automation. For quick lookups use gget; for multi-service integration use…
diffdock
DiffDock and DiffDock-L molecular docking. Use for protein-small-molecule pose prediction from PDB or sequence plus SMILES/SDF/MOL2, batch docking, virtual screening, and pose-confidence interpretation. Not for binding affinity prediction.