Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/tupe12334/instinct/stp-frameworknpx skills add tupe12334/instinct --skill stp-frameworkgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/tupe12334/instinctWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00018 | $0.02096 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00009 | $0.01048 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00419 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00210 |
Grade A, and why
stp-framework scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 132 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
STP Framework (Segmentation, Targeting, Positioning)
Overview
STP is a three-stage marketing strategy process that moves from a broad market down to a specific, ownable position. It answers three questions in sequence: Who exists in this market? Who should we focus on? How should we be perceived by them?
FULL MARKET
│
▼
┌─────────────┐
│ SEGMENTATION│ Divide the market into distinct groups
└──────┬──────┘
│
▼
┌─────────────┐
│ TARGETING │ Evaluate and select which segments to serve
└──────┬──────┘
│
▼
┌─────────────┐
│ POSITIONING │ Define how you want to be seen by that segment
└─────────────┘
Core Concepts
Segmentation
Splitting a heterogeneous market into groups that are internally similar and externally distinct. Four common bases:
| Basis | Examples |
|---|---|
| Demographic | Age, income, job title, company size |
| Geographic | Region, urban/rural, country |
| Psychographic | Values, lifestyle, risk tolerance, goals |
| Behavioral | Usage frequency, purchase trigger, loyalty, benefits sought |
A usable segment must be: Measurable (size is knowable), Accessible (you can reach them), Substantial (large enough to be profitable), Differentiable (responds differently to your offer), Actionable (you can serve it).
Targeting
Choosing which segment(s) to pursue. Three standard coverage strategies:
- Undifferentiated — one offer for the whole market (commodity play; rarely wins)
- Differentiated — separate offers for multiple segments (higher cost, broader reach)
- Concentrated / Niche — full focus on one segment (highest fit, lowest spread risk)
Evaluate each candidate segment against: segment size and growth, competitive intensity, fit with your capabilities, cost to serve, strategic alignment.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 132 lines · 18 tokens per session scan A 238f30234aa9
stp-framework is a skill published in the GitHub repository tupe12334/instinct (1 stars, last pushed 16d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 18 tokens to every session and 2,096 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
thinking-model-router
When unsure which thinking skill fits, map domain and problem type, then return NONE or one primary skill by default (at most three complementary).
thinking-red-team
For authorized security review of code, auth, or APIs you control, model the attacker, map the attack surface, and report only findings with a reproducible exploit path and verified mitigation.
thinking-scientific-method
When a symptom has several plausible causes, rank falsifiable hypotheses and run the cheapest discriminating observation first; prefer least-assumptive survivors only after evidence fit.
thinking-systems
When behavior is emergent across components—fixes elsewhere break, loops/delays dominate—map boundary, stocks/flows, feedback, archetypes, then rank leverage.
thinking-circle-of-competence
Use when a specific claim may lack grounding. Check evidence boundary, size wrongness cost, then answer, fetch, or abstain — never confabulate.
thinking-five-whys-plus
When a fault is localized and the proximate cause is known but the systemic root is not, chain evidence-linked whys with a counterfactual stop and a countermeasure.