AuC is a Python framework for running a single AI agent with an asynchronous, pluggable reasoning loop, language-model adapters, permission levels, and observable events. It is used to build coding and conversational agents with tools, security checks, web interfaces, background jobs, evaluations, and isolated execution. The catalogue entries are skills for extending its agent workflow.
Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add ufy2024/AuC --skill git-workflowgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ufy2024/AuCWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/ufy2024/auc/git-workflow)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ufy2024/auc/git-workflow"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ufy2024/auc/git-workflow/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ufy2024/auc/git-workflow"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ufy2024/auc/git-workflow.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 8 findings, up to high
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- high Tool Misuse · line 225 Tool parameters are crafted to achieve unintended or unsafe behavior. Parameter abuse can bypass intended safety checks (e.g. shell=True, --force, dangerous glob patterns).Fix: Validate all tool parameters against an allowlist. Reject dangerous parameter values (shell=True, --force, -rf /) and use safe defaults.
- high Tool Misuse · line 704 Tool parameters are crafted to achieve unintended or unsafe behavior. Parameter abuse can bypass intended safety checks (e.g. shell=True, --force, dangerous glob patterns).Fix: Validate all tool parameters against an allowlist. Reject dangerous parameter values (shell=True, --force, -rf /) and use safe defaults.
- high Privilege Escalation · line 542 Code accesses credential files (SSH keys, AWS credentials, etc.). This could indicate credential theft attempts.Fix: Remove references to credential paths. Use environment variables or secrets managers. For docs, use placeholder paths (e.g., /path/to/config). Never load .env or token files in production code paths.
- high Privilege Escalation · line 689 Code accesses credential files (SSH keys, AWS credentials, etc.). This could indicate credential theft attempts.Fix: Remove references to credential paths. Use environment variables or secrets managers. For docs, use placeholder paths (e.g., /path/to/config). Never load .env or token files in production code paths.
- high Privilege Escalation · line 543 Code accesses credential files (SSH keys, AWS credentials, etc.). This could indicate credential theft attempts.Fix: Remove references to credential paths. Use environment variables or secrets managers. For docs, use placeholder paths (e.g., /path/to/config). Never load .env or token files in production code paths.
- high Tool Misuse · line 625 Tool parameters are crafted to achieve unintended or unsafe behavior. Parameter abuse can bypass intended safety checks (e.g. shell=True, --force, dangerous glob patterns).Fix: Validate all tool parameters against an allowlist. Reject dangerous parameter values (shell=True, --force, -rf /) and use safe defaults.
- medium Agent Snooping · line 21 Skill enumerates or reads other installed skills. Access to other skills' SKILL.md files or the skills directory reveals prompt instructions, capabilities, and secrets that should be invisible to peer skills.Fix: Remove all code or instructions that list or read other skills' files or directories. Skills should operate independently; cross-skill access is a privilege escalation.
- medium MCP Rug Pull · line 479 npx commands without a version suffix (e.g. @1.0.0) create a rug-pull risk if the upstream server is compromised and publishes a malicious update.Fix: Pin the version: npx @scope/[email protected]
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00033 | $0.03981 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00013 | $0.01592 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00796 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00398 |
Grade A, and why
git-workflow scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
91% identical to git-workflow — 27 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 737 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Git Workflow Patterns
Best practices for Git version control, branching strategies, and collaborative development.
When to Activate
- Setting up Git workflow for a new project
- Deciding on branching strategy (GitFlow, trunk-based, GitHub flow)
- Writing commit messages and PR descriptions
- Resolving merge conflicts
- Managing releases and version tags
- Onboarding new team members to Git practices
Branching Strategies
GitHub Flow (Simple, Recommended for Most)
Best for continuous deployment and small-to-medium teams.
main (protected, always deployable)
│
├── feature/user-auth → PR → merge to main
├── feature/payment-flow → PR → merge to main
└── fix/login-bug → PR → merge to main
Rules:
mainis always deployable- Create feature branches from
main - Open Pull Request when ready for review
- After approval and CI passes, merge to
main - Deploy immediately after merge
Trunk-Based Development (High-Velocity Teams)
Best for teams with strong CI/CD and feature flags.
main (trunk)
│
├── short-lived feature (1-2 days max)
├── short-lived feature
└── short-lived feature
Rules:
- Everyone commits to
mainor very short-lived branches - Feature flags hide incomplete work
- CI must pass before merge
- Deploy multiple times per day
GitFlow (Complex, Release-Cycle Driven)
Best for scheduled releases and enterprise projects.
main (production releases)
│
└── develop (integration branch)
│
├── feature/user-auth
├── feature/payment
│
├── release/1.0.0 → merge to main and develop
│
└── hotfix/critical → merge to main and develop
Rules:
maincontains production-ready code onlydevelopis the integration branch- Feature branches from
develop, merge back todevelop - Release branches from
develop, merge tomainanddevelop - Hotfix branches from
main, merge to bothmainanddevelop
When to Use Which
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 737 lines · 33 tokens per session scan A 83a99100dc5d
git-workflow is a skill published in the GitHub repository ufy2024/AuC (1,080 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 33 tokens to every session and 3,981 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 91% identical to git-workflow, differing in 27 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
github-automation
GitHub workflow automation, PR management, issue tracking, and code review coordination. Integrates with GitHub Actions and repository management. Use when: PR creation, code review, issue management, release automation, workflow setup. Skip when: local-only changes, non-GitHub repositories.
changelog
Auto-generate a changelog from git commits and sprint data. Internal and player-facing versions.
comet-safe-delivery
A Chinese-language procedure for safely delivering specified Comet changes through Git. It covers checking worktrees and unrelated edits, staging exact files, validating hooks, and authorized commits or pushes.
git-workflow
Guided git workflows: prepare PRs, clean up branches, resolve merge conflicts, handle monorepo tags, squash-and-merge patterns. Use when asked to prepare a PR, clean branches, resolve conflicts, or tag a release.
git-push
A GitHub publishing workflow that handles first-time uploads, routine updates, and tagged releases. Git is a system for recording code changes, while GitHub hosts repositories and releases online.
close-task-commit-push-pr
Close the active backlog task (detected from branch name), commit all changes, push to remote, and open a pull request. Use when the user says "close task and ship it", "close task commit push pr", or invokes /close-task-commit-push-pr.