AuC is a Python framework for running a single AI agent with an asynchronous, pluggable reasoning loop, language-model adapters, permission levels, and observable events. It is used to build coding and conversational agents with tools, security checks, web interfaces, background jobs, evaluations, and isolated execution. The catalogue entries are skills for extending its agent workflow.
Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add ufy2024/AuC --skill golang-testinggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ufy2024/AuCWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/ufy2024/auc/golang-testing)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ufy2024/auc/golang-testing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ufy2024/auc/golang-testing.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 1 finding, up to medium
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- medium Agent Snooping · line 20 Skill enumerates or reads other installed skills. Access to other skills' SKILL.md files or the skills directory reveals prompt instructions, capabilities, and secrets that should be invisible to peer skills.Fix: Remove all code or instructions that list or read other skills' files or directories. Skills should operate independently; cross-skill access is a privilege escalation.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00035 | $0.04378 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00017 | $0.02189 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00876 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00438 |
Grade A, and why
golang-testing scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
8 near-identical copies found in the catalogue:
- golang-testing — 91% identical, 27 lines differ
- golang-testing — 91% identical, 27 lines differ
- golang-testing — 91% identical, 27 lines differ
- golang-testing — 91% identical, 27 lines differ
- golang-testing — 91% identical, 27 lines differ
- golang-testing — 89% identical, 28 lines differ
- golang-testing — 89% identical, 28 lines differ
- golang-testing — 89% identical, 27 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 742 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Go Testing Patterns
Comprehensive Go testing patterns for writing reliable, maintainable tests following TDD methodology.
When to Activate
- Writing new Go functions or methods
- Adding test coverage to existing code
- Creating benchmarks for performance-critical code
- Implementing fuzz tests for input validation
- Following TDD workflow in Go projects
TDD Workflow for Go
The RED-GREEN-REFACTOR Cycle
RED → Write a failing test first
GREEN → Write minimal code to pass the test
REFACTOR → Improve code while keeping tests green
REPEAT → Continue with next requirement
Step-by-Step TDD in Go
// Step 1: Define the interface/signature
// calculator.go
package calculator
func Add(a, b int) int {
panic("not implemented") // Placeholder
}
// Step 2: Write failing test (RED)
// calculator_test.go
package calculator
import "testing"
func TestAdd(t *testing.T) {
got := Add(2, 3)
want := 5
if got != want {
t.Errorf("Add(2, 3) = %d; want %d", got, want)
}
}
// Step 3: Run test - verify FAIL
// $ go test
// --- FAIL: TestAdd (0.00s)
// panic: not implemented
// Step 4: Implement minimal code (GREEN)
func Add(a, b int) int {
return a + b
}
// Step 5: Run test - verify PASS
// $ go test
// PASS
// Step 6: Refactor if needed, verify tests still pass
Table-Driven Tests
The standard pattern for Go tests. Enables comprehensive coverage with minimal code.
func TestAdd(t *testing.T) {
tests := []struct {
name string
a, b int
expected int
}{
{"positive numbers", 2, 3, 5},
{"negative numbers", -1, -2, -3},
{"zero values", 0, 0, 0},
{"mixed signs", -1, 1, 0},
{"large numbers", 1000000, 2000000, 3000000},
}
for _, tt := range tests {
t.Run(tt.name, func(t *testing.T) {
got := Add(tt.a, tt.b)
if got != tt.expected {
t.Errorf("Add(%d, %d) = %d; want %d",
tt.a, tt.b, got, tt.expected)
}
})
}
}
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 742 lines · 35 tokens per session scan A b47ba6034c4f
golang-testing is a skill published in the GitHub repository ufy2024/AuC (1,090 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 35 tokens to every session and 4,378 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
tdd-workflow
Enforce practical Test-Driven Development for code changes in Go services. Use for new features, bug fixes, refactors, API changes, and new modules. Requires Red-Green-Refactor evidence, defect-hypothesis-driven tests, killer cases, and coverage gates (line + risk-path).
go-test
Enforce TDD workflow for Go. Write table-driven tests first, then implement. Verify 80%+ coverage with go test -cover.
blitz
/blitz - Blitz Mode Commander.
go-tdd-baby-steps
TDD with baby steps for Go. Use when writing tests, doing TDD, practicing red-green-refactor, or when test cycles feel too large and risky. Also use when the user asks about incremental test development, test-first workflow, or wants help breaking a feature into small testable steps. Covers table-driven tests…
golang-testing
Go testing patterns including table-driven tests, subtests, benchmarks, fuzzing, and test coverage. Follows TDD methodology with idiomatic Go practices.
skillshare-implement-feature
Implement a feature from a spec file or description using TDD workflow. Use this skill whenever the user asks to: add a new CLI command, implement a feature from a spec, build new functionality, add a flag, create a new internal package, or write Go code for skillshare. This skill enforces test-first development…