Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add ur-grue/autopunk-media-skills --skill creative-commons-explainergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ur-grue/autopunk-media-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/ur-grue/autopunk-media-skills/creative-commons-explainer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ur-grue/autopunk-media-skills/creative-commons-explainer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ur-grue/autopunk-media-skills/creative-commons-explainer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ur-grue/autopunk-media-skills/creative-commons-explainer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ur-grue/autopunk-media-skills/creative-commons-explainer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 1 finding, up to high
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- high Anti-Refusal · line 44 Skill instructs the agent to omit warnings, disclaimers, or ethical commentary. Stripping safety caveats hides risk from the user and is a common jailbreak preamble.Fix: Remove instructions that suppress warnings, disclaimers, or ethical commentary. Let the agent surface safety-relevant caveats to the user.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00047 | $0.01855 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00023 | $0.00928 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00371 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00186 |
Grade A, and why
creative-commons-explainer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 103 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Creative Commons Explainer
What This Skill Does
Explains a specific Creative Commons licence in plain language, telling a media professional exactly what they can and cannot do with the licensed content — including attribution requirements, commercial use rules, and derivative work restrictions.
When To Use This Skill
- You found an image, video, audio clip, or text labelled with a Creative Commons licence and need to know if you can use it
- You want to understand the difference between CC licence types before choosing one for your own work
- You need to confirm whether a specific use (commercial broadcast, remix, adaptation, social media repost) is permitted under a given CC licence
- You are writing usage guidelines for your team and need a clear, jargon-free summary of each licence type
What You Need To Provide
Required:
- The Creative Commons licence type (e.g., CC BY 4.0, CC BY-SA 3.0, CC BY-NC-ND 4.0, CC0) — the full name, the abbreviation, or the URL from the licence deed
Optional:
- Your intended use (editorial article, commercial broadcast, YouTube video, podcast, social media, remix/adaptation, print publication)
- Whether you plan to modify the work (crop, edit, translate, incorporate into a larger piece)
- Whether your use is commercial or non-commercial
- The specific content you are licensing (helps the assistant give concrete examples of compliant attribution)
How the Assistant Approaches This
-
Identifies the licence and version. Creative Commons licences differ meaningfully between versions (2.0, 3.0, 4.0). The assistant confirms the exact licence and version, notes any differences from the current version if relevant, and flags if the licence URL or abbreviation does not match a valid CC licence.
-
Explains the licence in four plain-language categories. Every CC licence answer covers: (a) Can I use this commercially? (b) Can I modify, remix, or adapt it? (c) Do I have to credit the creator, and how? (d) Do I have to share my version under the same licence? These four questions cover 95% of what media professionals need to know.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 103 lines · 47 tokens per session scan A 954e96f3daa1
creative-commons-explainer is a skill published in the GitHub repository ur-grue/autopunk-media-skills (30 stars, last pushed 10d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 47 tokens to every session and 1,855 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-04.
Other skills, from other repositories
common-law-contract-formation-consideration
Anwalt oder Mandant will Vertragsschluss-Grundlagen des Common Law verstehen: offer acceptance consideration deed promissory estoppel UCC. Anwendungsfall Transaktionsvertrag oder NDA mit UK/US-Gegenpartei. Prüfraster Consideration-Prüfung Deed-Anforderungen Estoppel-Risiko UCC-Varianten. Output Erklärung…
common-law-simulation-negotiation
Anwalt oder Mandant will UK/US-Vertragsverhandlung oder Mandantengespraech simulieren und False-Friends-Lernkurve absolvieren. Prüfraster Verhandlungs-Simulation Issue-List-Erstellung Mandanten-Erklärung. Output Simulations-Szenario Verhandlungs-Script Lern-Feedback. Abgrenzung zu common-law-quality-gate (Qualitaet)…
common-law-litigation-discovery
Anwalt oder Mandant ist in UK/US-Gerichtsverfahren und will pleadings discovery disclosure depositions privilege evidence settlement verstehen. Prüfraster Verfahrensphasen-Überblick Privilege-Prüfung Discovery-Scope Settlement-Optionen. Output Verfahrens-Erklärung Checkliste. Abgrenzung zu…
common-law-interpretation-precedent
Deutscher Anwalt liest UK oder US-Gerichtsentscheidung und versteht Praezedenzfall-Logik nicht: ratio decidendi obiter dictum stare decisis Vertragsauslegung. Normen UK Supreme Court Rules US Federal Rules. Prüfraster Ratio-obiter-Unterscheidung Binding-Persuasive-Abgrenzung Auslegungs-Methode. Output…
Open Source License Review
Use when reviewing the open-source licenses present in or proposed for a project to identify compliance obligations and flag compatibility or disclosure risks for attorney review.
ksb-d07-k0033
Policy Interpretation: Guidance document analysis, regulatory precedent evaluation, interpretation consistency, implementat...