meta-ml-screener

meta-ml-screener is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from Vambrocop/EvidenceForge. It costs 62 tokens per session (557 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A workflow for using machine learning to assist with systematic reviews, which collect and assess research studies to answer a focused question. It keeps eligibility decisions, final inclusion choices, and effect-size checks under human review.

In plain words
What is it for?
It helps prioritize papers, remove duplicates, classify studies or outcomes, assist with data extraction, flag risk of bias, discover topics, and find possible moderators.
Why use it?
It reduces the amount of manual screening and extraction work while preserving an audit trail and human checks for uncertain or important decisions.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one.

Good fit It helps prioritize papers, remove duplicates, classify studies or outcomes, assist with data extraction, flag risk of bias, discover topics, and find possible moderators.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/vambrocop/evidenceforge/meta-ml-screener
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add Vambrocop/EvidenceForge --skill meta-ml-screener
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Vambrocop/EvidenceForge

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for meta-ml-screener

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/vambrocop/evidenceforge/meta-ml-screener/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/vambrocop/evidenceforge/meta-ml-screener)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/vambrocop/evidenceforge/meta-ml-screener"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/vambrocop/evidenceforge/meta-ml-screener/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for meta-ml-screener

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/vambrocop/evidenceforge/meta-ml-screener"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/vambrocop/evidenceforge/meta-ml-screener.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 62 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 557 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00062 $0.00557
Opus 5.5 $0.00025 $0.00223
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00012 $0.00111
Haiku 4.5 $0.00006 $0.00056

Measured 1mo ago against content hash 45dd15448607, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

meta-ml-screener scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.

The scan reads SKILL.md. This mod also ships 1 executable file (scripts/validate_screening_log.py), listed below but not scanned — reading those needs a real analyzer, not pattern matching.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/meta-ml-screener/SKILL.md · 91 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 91 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Meta ML Screener

Use this skill when machine learning will assist a systematic review or meta-analysis.

Core Principle

ML can reduce workload, prioritize records, extract candidates, and explore heterogeneity. It should not hide eligibility criteria, final inclusion decisions, or effect-size verification.

Intake

Identify the ML task:

  • deduplication;
  • title/abstract screening;
  • full-text triage;
  • study design classification;
  • outcome classification;
  • extraction assistance;
  • risk-of-bias triage;
  • topic modeling;
  • moderator discovery.

Identify:

  • labeled data available;
  • human verification plan;
  • recall requirement;
  • audit log format;
  • software or platform;
  • whether LLMs are used.

Load references/ml-assisted-review.md for task-specific guidance.

Workflow

  1. Define ML role and what decisions remain human.
  2. Create seed labels or validation set.
  3. Define features, model, or prompt schema.
  4. Run prioritization/classification/extraction.
  5. Record scores, labels, and decisions.
  6. Validate recall or extraction accuracy.
  7. Escalate uncertain records to human review.
  8. Export decisions, model scores, prompts/schemas, and human adjudication.
  9. Report ML use transparently.

Use:

  • templates/screening-log.md for a human-readable log.
  • templates/screening-log-schema.csv for machine-readable logging.
  • templates/example-screening-log.csv for a minimal example.
  • scripts/validate_screening_log.py to check required fields, exclusion reasons, duplicate record IDs, and human follow-up decisions.

Output Modes

ML Screening Plan

ML task:
Human decision point:
Training/seed labels:
Validation metric:
Audit log:
Stopping rule:
Failure modes:
Reporting sentence:

Extraction Schema

Field:
Definition:
Source anchor:
Confidence:
Human verification:

Guardrails

  • Do not exclude records solely because the model is confident unless the protocol explicitly allows it and recall is validated.
  • Do not use LLM-extracted numbers without source anchors and verification.
  • Do not treat ML-discovered moderators as confirmatory.
  • Do not hide prompt/model/version details if they affect review decisions.
  • Do not let automation erase exclusion reasons or reviewer accountability.
  • Do not accept a screening log as auditable unless human decisions and exclusion reasons are recorded.

Read the full file on GitHub · 91 lines

Files

What ships with it

5 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 1mo ago First seen · 91 lines · 62 tokens per session scan A 45dd15448607

Subscribe to this mod's changes

meta-ml-screener is a skill published in the GitHub repository Vambrocop/EvidenceForge (7 stars, last pushed 11d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 62 tokens to every session and 557 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

code-execution

Execute scientific Python code for computation, data analysis, simulation, and verification. Use when: (1) running statistical analyses, (2) numerical computation, (3) data processing pipelines, (4) verifying calculations, (5) running simulations. NOT for: literature search (use literature-search), writing papers (use…

beita6969/ScienceClaw · 78 tokens

nltk-linguistics

NLP and corpus analysis via NLTK. Use when: user asks about tokenization, POS tagging, parsing, sentiment, or corpus statistics. NOT for: deep learning NLP or transformer models.

beita6969/ScienceClaw · 46 tokens

model-assessment

Use when validating or evaluating a trained medical-imaging model. Audits split leakage and validation design, computes task-correct held-out metrics (Dice + HD95, AUROC + AUPRC, FROC, calibration), and covers uncertainty/OOD and Grad-CAM explainability, each with a gate.

Aperivue/medsci-skills · 66 tokens

model-scaffold

Use when you need a runnable PyTorch training repo for a medical-imaging task (segmentation, classification, detection, synthesis, self-supervised, or fine-tuning a pretrained backbone). Emits a patient-level seed-locked split, train/evaluate scripts, config and a Methods stub.

Aperivue/medsci-skills · 62 tokens

build-domain-ontology

Construct a tool-independent domain ontology: scope the domain, atomize concepts, type relations, build hierarchy, audit consistency, detect gaps, and refine confidence.

yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine · 36 tokens

radiomics-ml

Use when building or auditing a radiomics or tabular clinical-ML prediction model with a classical learner (LASSO, SVM, random forest, XGBoost and similar). Enforces nested CV, dimensionality control, in-fold feature selection, feature stability, calibration and external validation.

Aperivue/medsci-skills · 64 tokens