Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add vinvcn/addyosmani-agent-skills-zh --skill planning-and-task-breakdowngit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/vinvcn/addyosmani-agent-skills-zhWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/vinvcn/addyosmani-agent-skills-zh/planning-and-task-breakdown)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/vinvcn/addyosmani-agent-skills-zh/planning-and-task-breakdown"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/vinvcn/addyosmani-agent-skills-zh/planning-and-task-breakdown/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/vinvcn/addyosmani-agent-skills-zh/planning-and-task-breakdown"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/vinvcn/addyosmani-agent-skills-zh/planning-and-task-breakdown.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00053 | $0.01819 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00026 | $0.00910 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00364 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00182 |
Grade A, and why
planning-and-task-breakdown scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 224 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Planning and Task Breakdown
概览
把工作拆解成小而可验证的任务,并为每个任务写明验收标准。好的任务拆解,是可靠完成工作的 agent 和产出纠缠混乱结果的 agent 之间的区别。每个任务都应该足够小,能在一次专注会话中实现、测试和验证。
何时使用
- 你已有 spec,需要把它拆成可实现单元
- 一个任务感觉太大或太模糊,难以下手
- 工作需要跨多个 agents 或会话并行
- 你需要向人类沟通范围
- 实现顺序并不明显
何时不要使用: 范围显而易见的单文件变更,或 spec 已经包含定义良好的任务。
计划流程
步骤 1:进入 Plan Mode
写任何代码之前,以只读模式运行:
- 阅读 spec 和相关代码库区域
- 识别现有模式和约定
- 映射组件之间的依赖
- 记录风险和未知项
规划期间不要写代码。 输出是一份计划文档,而不是实现。
步骤 2:识别依赖图
映射什么依赖什么:
Database schema
│
├── API models/types
│ │
│ ├── API endpoints
│ │ │
│ │ └── Frontend API client
│ │ │
│ │ └── UI components
│ │
│ └── Validation logic
│
└── Seed data / migrations
实现顺序沿依赖图自底向上:先构建基础。
步骤 3:垂直切片
不要先构建全部数据库、再构建全部 API、再构建全部 UI。一次构建一条完整功能路径:
坏例(水平切片):
Task 1: Build entire database schema
Task 2: Build all API endpoints
Task 3: Build all UI components
Task 4: Connect everything
好例(垂直切片):
Task 1: User can create an account (schema + API + UI for registration)
Task 2: User can log in (auth schema + API + UI for login)
Task 3: User can create a task (task schema + API + UI for creation)
Task 4: User can view task list (query + API + UI for list view)
每个垂直切片都交付可工作的、可测试的功能。
步骤 4:编写任务
每个任务遵循这个结构:
## Task [N]: [Short descriptive title]
**Description:** One paragraph explaining what this task accomplishes.
**Acceptance criteria:**
- [ ] [Specific, testable condition]
- [ ] [Specific, testable condition]
**Verification:**
- [ ] Tests pass: `npm test -- --grep "feature-name"`
- [ ] Build succeeds: `npm run build`
- [ ] Manual check: [description of what to verify]
**Dependencies:** [Task numbers this depends on, or "None"]
**Files likely touched:**
- `src/path/to/file.ts`
- `tests/path/to/test.ts`
**Estimated scope:** [Small: 1-2 files | Medium: 3-5 files | Large: 5+ files]
步骤 5:排序并设置检查点
安排任务时确保:
- 依赖已满足(先构建基础)
- 每个任务结束时系统仍处于可工作状态
- 每 2-3 个任务后出现验证检查点
- 高风险任务靠前(快速失败)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 224 lines · 53 tokens per session scan A 0877762741dd
planning-and-task-breakdown is a skill published in the GitHub repository vinvcn/addyosmani-agent-skills-zh (31 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 53 tokens to every session and 1,819 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
test-driven-development
Drives development with tests via Red-Green-Refactor and the Prove-It pattern, with hard rules against weakening assertions or faking green suites. Use when implementing any logic, fixing any bug, or changing any behavior. Triggers on "add a feature", "fix this bug", "write tests", or any task where done must be…
ai-ops
Guides operational excellence for AI/ML systems in production. Use when deploying models, managing inference infrastructure, monitoring model drift, or maintaining AI-powered features. Use when you need reliable, observable, and governable machine learning systems.
ci-cd-and-automation
Automates CI/CD pipeline setup. Use when setting up or modifying build and deployment pipelines. Use when you need to automate quality gates, configure test runners in CI, or establish deployment strategies.
context-engineering
Optimizes agent context setup. Use when starting a new session, when agent output quality degrades, when switching between tasks, or when you need to configure rules files and context for a project.
data-engineering
Guides data pipeline design, ETL/ELT workflows, schema evolution, and data quality assurance. Use when building data pipelines, designing data warehouses, migrating schemas, or ensuring data integrity across systems. Use when you need reliable, testable, and observable data flows.
debugging-and-error-recovery
Guides systematic root-cause debugging with hard rules against guess-fixes and symptom suppression. Use when tests fail, builds break, behavior doesn't match expectations, or you encounter any unexpected error. Triggers on "this is broken", "tests are failing", "why doesn't this work", or any error output.