Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add vladkesler/initrunner --skill coverage-analysisgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/vladkesler/initrunnerWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/vladkesler/initrunner/coverage-analysis)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/vladkesler/initrunner/coverage-analysis"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/vladkesler/initrunner/coverage-analysis/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/vladkesler/initrunner/coverage-analysis"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/vladkesler/initrunner/coverage-analysis.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 4 findings, up to medium
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- medium MCP Rug Pull · line 31 npx commands without a version suffix (e.g. @1.0.0) create a rug-pull risk if the upstream server is compromised and publishes a malicious update.Fix: Pin the version: npx @scope/[email protected]
- medium MCP Rug Pull · line 71 npx commands without a version suffix (e.g. @1.0.0) create a rug-pull risk if the upstream server is compromised and publishes a malicious update.Fix: Pin the version: npx @scope/[email protected]
- medium MCP Rug Pull · line 33 npx commands without a version suffix (e.g. @1.0.0) create a rug-pull risk if the upstream server is compromised and publishes a malicious update.Fix: Pin the version: npx @scope/[email protected]
- medium MCP Rug Pull · line 76 npx commands without a version suffix (e.g. @1.0.0) create a rug-pull risk if the upstream server is compromised and publishes a malicious update.Fix: Pin the version: npx @scope/[email protected]
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00026 | $0.00738 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00295 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00148 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00074 |
Grade A, and why
coverage-analysis scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 95 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Coverage analysis for identifying and prioritizing untested code.
When to activate
Use this skill after tests pass, or when asked to analyze coverage gaps and determine which untested code should be covered next.
Python coverage
- Run:
pytest --cov=<package> --cov-report=term-missing - The
MISScolumn shows uncovered line ranges (e.g.45-52, 78). - Configure in
.coveragercorpyproject.tomlunder[tool.coverage]: setomitto exclude vendored code, migrations, and test files from the report. - Branch coverage: add
--cov-branchto detect branches where only one path is tested. - HTML report:
--cov-report=htmlgenerateshtmlcov/index.htmlfor visual inspection.
JavaScript coverage
- Jest:
npx jest --coverage-- outputs a table and generatescoverage/directory. - Vitest:
npx vitest run --coverage-- requires@vitest/coverage-v8or@vitest/coverage-istanbul. - Interpret the table:
% Stmts,% Branch,% Funcs,% Lines, andUncovered Line #s. - Configure in
jest.config.*orvitest.config.*withcoverageThresholdto enforce minimums.
Interpreting results
- Focus on uncovered branches, not just uncovered lines -- a line can be "covered" while half its branches are not.
- Identify high-risk uncovered code: error handlers, input validators, authentication checks, and security-sensitive paths.
- Ignore generated code,
__init__.pyfiles that only re-export, and vendored third-party code. - Look for patterns: if every error handler is uncovered, that signals a systematic gap in error-path testing.
Gap prioritization
Rank uncovered code by risk, not by line count:
- Security-sensitive -- authentication, authorization, input sanitization, cryptographic operations.
- Business logic -- core domain rules, financial calculations, state transitions.
- Utilities -- parsing, formatting, data transformation helpers.
- Boilerplate -- logging setup, CLI argument wiring, import guards.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 95 lines · 26 tokens per session scan A 7a23e42dfa35
coverage-analysis is a skill published in the GitHub repository vladkesler/initrunner (41 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 26 tokens to every session and 738 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
Vizra ADK Evaluation Framework
Test and evaluate AI agents with automated evaluations, assertions, and LLM-as-a-Judge patterns.
quality-gate-orchestrator
Tracks required validation gates, records pass/fail/waived results, and reports readiness before task completion.
test-driven-development
Red-green-refactor discipline. Use when writing new functionality.
test-reporting
Run the Level 2 dummy agent integration test suite and produce a detailed HTML report with per-test input → outcome analysis.
Vizra ADK Tool Creation
Build custom tools for Vizra ADK agents - includes patterns for database, API, file, and email tools.
Vizra ADK Memory System
Implement persistent memory, session context, and vector memory (RAG) for AI agents.