Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add vladolaru/claude-code-plugins --skill code-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/vladolaru/claude-code-pluginsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/vladolaru/claude-code-plugins/code-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/vladolaru/claude-code-plugins/code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/vladolaru/claude-code-plugins/code-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/vladolaru/claude-code-plugins/code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/vladolaru/claude-code-plugins/code-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 3 findings, up to high
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- high Tool Misuse · line 73 Tool parameters are crafted to achieve unintended or unsafe behavior. Parameter abuse can bypass intended safety checks (e.g. shell=True, --force, dangerous glob patterns).Fix: Validate all tool parameters against an allowlist. Reject dangerous parameter values (shell=True, --force, -rf /) and use safe defaults.
- medium Rogue Agent · line 37 Skill establishes unauthorized persistence across sessions via cron jobs, startup scripts, or state files. Session persistence allows an attacker to maintain access beyond the current interaction.Fix: Remove any persistence mechanisms (cron jobs, startup scripts, state files). Skills should not maintain state across sessions without explicit user consent.
- medium Excessive Agency · line 38 Skill enables autonomous high-impact decisions without human-in-the-loop verification. Critical operations (destructive commands, financial transactions, data deletion) should require explicit user confirmation.Fix: Add human-in-the-loop confirmation for destructive, irreversible, or high-impact operations. Never auto-execute commands that modify files, send data, or alter system state.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00018 | $0.00996 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00398 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00199 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00100 |
Grade A, and why
code-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 93 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Codex Host Adapter
This skill is generated from the canonical Claude Code command named above. To execute it in Codex:
- Treat the text supplied after the skill mention as the invocation arguments. Substitute that exact text for
${CODEX_SKILL_ARGUMENTS}before executing shell commands. - Resolve
CODEX_PLUGIN_ROOTto the absolute plugin root. The loaded skill directory is<plugin-root>/codex-skills/<skill-name>, so the plugin root is two directories above the directory containing thisSKILL.md. - Assign both variables explicitly in any shell call that uses them. Codex does not export these instruction variables automatically.
- Use Codex's available user-input and subagent tools when the workflow requests them.
- Follow the canonical workflow below without skipping its gates or artifact checks.
Canonical Workflow
You are a code review orchestrator. Your mission: ensure the review pipeline runs to completion with dedication, precision, and care - producing a comprehensive, accurate, and actionable review of the code changes that the author can act on and that maintains a high quality bar for the codebase and its users.
This run reviews new commits since the last review on this branch. On
first run, reviews all changes (same as $pirategoat-tools:full-code-review).
Workflow
A Python script provides step-specific briefings. Call it once per step, read the briefing carefully, execute every action in it, then call it again for the next step indicated in the output.
Each briefing specifies required artifacts. Treat each as a contract - write the file, verify it exists, then move on. Do not skip verification.
Starting the Workflow
Parse arguments: ${CODEX_SKILL_ARGUMENTS}
- Empty: incremental review (only new commits since last review)
fullorreset: delete the review baseline and do a full review- Branch name: review that branch incrementally
- Explicit git range (contains
..): review that range
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago Changed · -1 lines ac36dae204a6
- 1mo ago First seen · 94 lines · 18 tokens per session scan A 38a485abd67f
code-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository vladolaru/claude-code-plugins (8 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 18 tokens to every session and 996 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
autoreview
Structured code review through the shared OpenClaw agent-skills installation.
omh-code-review
This is an OMH code-review workflow skill, projected for Agent Skills hosts (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, opencode, OpenClaw, pi).
revdiff-plan
Review the last Codex assistant message (plan, analysis, or proposal) with inline annotations in a TUI overlay. Extracts the most recent response from Codex rollout files and opens it in revdiff for review and annotation. Activates on "revdiff-plan", "review plan with revdiff", "annotate plan", "review last response"…
asplos-writing-style
Use when drafting or revising ASPLOS prose — engineering the first two pages that rapid review actually reads, stating the cross-layer insight as one quotable sentence, structuring per-layer mechanism sections, writing bounded claims, and fitting everything into 11 self-contained pages that include figures and…
explore-unknowns
Guide the user through a quadrant walk that maps the unknowns of a task — open by listing the known knowns, then work through known unknowns, unknown knowns, and unknown unknowns one stage at a time, ending with a complete four-quadrant map in the user's hands. Use when a request is ambiguous or underspecified, the…
re0-merge
Review and land an external contribution the way this suite does: gate it against the thesis, land it with the author's credit intact, complete a new skill rather than merging it raw, then approve, credit, and explain before closing. Use when reviewing a pull request, as any collaborator or maintainer, not only the…