spec-anchored-agentic-development: Skill for Claude Code

.agents/skills/implement-feature/SKILL.md

implement-feature is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from w00fx/spec-anchored-agentic-development. It costs 62 tokens per session (754 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A supervised workflow for implementing a feature from an approved specification, issue, or backlog item. It requires direct human participation and follows a defined implementation protocol.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it when explicitly starting feature work that has an approved plan or requirement, with the developer present to satisfy each review and implementation step.
Why use it?
It provides checkpoints for controlled code changes and prevents the workflow from being used in unattended or unsuitable modes.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for Claude Code and Codex: disable-model-invocation in frontmatter, but also agents/openai.yaml present. Also seen: installed under .agents/ (shared by several agents).

This is w00fx/spec-anchored-agentic-development's own configuration. It tells Claude Code and Codex how to work on spec-anchored-agentic-development itself, so it is not a mod to install elsewhere. Copy it as a starting point and replace the rules that are about this project. Everything spec-anchored-agentic-development configures →

Reuse

Borrowing it

Nothing to install: this file belongs to w00fx/spec-anchored-agentic-development. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.

Copy the file
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/w00fx/spec-anchored-agentic-development/main/.agents/skills/implement-feature/SKILL.md
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/w00fx/spec-anchored-agentic-development

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for implement-feature

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/w00fx/spec-anchored-agentic-development/implement-feature/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/w00fx/spec-anchored-agentic-development/implement-feature)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/w00fx/spec-anchored-agentic-development/implement-feature"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/w00fx/spec-anchored-agentic-development/implement-feature/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for implement-feature

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/w00fx/spec-anchored-agentic-development/implement-feature"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/w00fx/spec-anchored-agentic-development/implement-feature.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 62 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 754 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00062 $0.00754
Opus 5.5 $0.00025 $0.00302
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00012 $0.00151
Haiku 4.5 $0.00006 $0.00075

Measured 1mo ago against content hash 9f331c1240de, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

implement-feature scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.agents/skills/implement-feature/SKILL.md · 71 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 71 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

implement-feature — supervised Owner adapter

First action: read .agents/protocols/implementation-protocol.md. It is the complete state machine. This adapter only names the providers for supervised work.

Mode identity

Invoke implement-feature <issue | spec slice | task> using the runtime's native explicit-skill syntax. The human is present in-session. Never launch this skill headlessly; use implement-backlog for unattended work and implement-orchestrated for an orchestrator-owned worker.

The parent agent is the Owner. The Owner alone talks to the human, owns the branch/run terminal, and decides whether to integrate commits returned by the two internal agents.

Gate and pass providers

Protocol need Provider in this mode
Ambiguity / unauthorized assumption Human in-session after repository research; present numbered options and a recommendation
Plan, scope, evidence, mutation/fuzz applicability Human approval of the exact APPROVAL-FINGERPRINT
Semantic spec amendment Human in-session; affected IDs, old → proposed meaning, rationale and verification delta; PR merge ratifies
Scope/dependency/schema/data/external-action expansion Human approval of a new scope + fingerprint
General code hardening (Phase 7) Dispatch only general-code-reviewer. It edits in an isolated worktree and returns a local commit + full change report. Owner inspects and accepts/rejects before integration
Mutation hardening (Phase 8) Dispatch only mutation-hardener. It may edit production/tests to reach the 100% target contract and returns a local commit + mutation report. Owner inspects and accepts/rejects before integration
External specialized reviews Outside this skill. The PR/pipeline/orchestrator may run spec, conformance, security, performance, compliance, architecture, or independent code review
Delivery PR opened; human reviews/merges. Terminal PR_READY_AWAITING_HUMAN

Agent call graph

Owner implementation
→ deterministic baseline
→ general-code-reviewer [internal authoring loop]
→ Owner diff review + integration
→ mutation-hardener [internal authoring loop to 100%]
→ Owner diff review + integration
→ final deterministic verification
→ PR / external review pipeline

Read the full file on GitHub · 71 lines

Files

What ships with it

2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 1mo ago Changed · +6 lines · -3 tokens per session 9f331c1240de
  2. 1mo ago First seen · 65 lines · 65 tokens per session scan A 3f9f996e2c36

Subscribe to this mod's changes

implement-feature is a skill published in the GitHub repository w00fx/spec-anchored-agentic-development (7 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 62 tokens to every session and 754 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.