Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add wgpsec/AboutSecurity --skill jwt-attack-methodologygit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/wgpsec/AboutSecurityWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/wgpsec/aboutsecurity/jwt-attack-methodology)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/wgpsec/aboutsecurity/jwt-attack-methodology"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/wgpsec/aboutsecurity/jwt-attack-methodology.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 1 finding, up to high
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- high YARA Match · line 39 YARA rule matched a hack tool or exploit indicator (offensive tools, reconnaissance, privilege escalation, or exploit frameworks).Fix: Remove offensive tool references and exploit code. Legitimate agent skills should not contain penetration testing tools, exploit frameworks, or reconnaissance utilities.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00138 | $0.01453 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00069 | $0.00727 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00028 | $0.00291 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00145 |
Grade A, and why
jwt-attack-methodology scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What ships with it
4 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 73 lines · 138 tokens per session scan A 0e64ecfd8868
jwt-attack-methodology is a skill published in the GitHub repository wgpsec/AboutSecurity (1,721 stars, last pushed 8d ago), with no licence file. It adds 138 tokens to every session and 1,453 once invoked, about $0.0007 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
hunt-auth-bypass
Hunting skill for auth bypass vulnerabilities. Built from 12 public bug bounty reports across SAML XSW / parser-differential (GitHub Enterprise CVE-2025-25291/25292), SAML signature stripping (Uber, Rocket.Chat, samlify CVE-2025-47949), SAML domain enforcement bypass via control characters (HackerOne 2024)…
redteam-api-detail-pack
Domain routing and boundary guidance for authorized API security testing, including BOLA/IDOR, authentication bypass, mass assignment, missing rate limits, and GraphQL issues. Use when a task belongs to the API testing domain and needs scope, evidence, pivot, or exit criteria.
netcat-async
Maintain bidirectional netcat-style TCP communications with persistent asynchronous input/output. Use when an agent must keep a connection open across multiple commands, send messages while receiving background output, inspect connection logs, or safely start/stop reusable sessions for protocol testing, CTF services…
ldap-injection
Exploit LDAP injection vulnerabilities during authorized penetration testing.
gakido
High-performance Python HTTP client with browser impersonation and anti-bot evasion. Use when the user needs to bypass bot detection, impersonate browsers with TLS fingerprinting, make HTTP/2/3 requests, or build web scrapers that evade anti-bot systems.
Erlang/OTP Exploitation
This skill should be used when Erlang/OTP services are detected: Port 4369 (EPMD - Erlang Port Mapper Daemon) Erlang SSH (usually port 2222) RabbitMQ, CouchDB, or other Erlang-based services Covers CVE-2025-32433 pre-auth RCE and other Erlang attack vectors.