Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to wingedsheep/argentum-engine. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wingedsheep/argentum-engine/main/.agents/skills/generate-scenario/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/wingedsheep/argentum-engineWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/wingedsheep/argentum-engine/generate-scenario)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/wingedsheep/argentum-engine/generate-scenario"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/wingedsheep/argentum-engine/generate-scenario/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/wingedsheep/argentum-engine/generate-scenario"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/wingedsheep/argentum-engine/generate-scenario.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00031 | $0.01886 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00943 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00377 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00189 |
Grade B, and why
generate-scenario scanned grade B with 2 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Sends data to an external URLmediumData exfiltration
A POST to an outside endpoint may be telemetry or may be exfiltration; either way the mod talks to somewhere, and you should know where.
- How to use it: `curl -X POST http://localhost:8080/api/dev/scenarios -H "Content-Type: application/json" -d @manual-scenarios/<path>/<filename>.json` Makes network callslowCapability
Not a fault in itself. Listed so you know the mod talks to something, and to what.
- How to use it: `curl -X POST http://localhost:8080/api/dev/scenarios -H "Content-Type: application/json" -d @manual-scenarios/<path>/<filename>.json` The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 148 lines · 31 tokens per session scan B fbc93d88460e
generate-scenario is a skill published in the GitHub repository wingedsheep/argentum-engine (65 stars, last pushed today), with no licence file. It adds 31 tokens to every session and 1,886 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it B with 2 findings (sends data to an external url, makes network calls). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
compose-ui-testing-patterns
Use when writing or reviewing Jetpack Compose UI tests, screenshot tests, previews, semantics assertions, fake image loading, keyboard input, focus assertions, interaction state (hover/pressed/focused), or tests for plain state-driven UI composables.
write-fixture
Write Java/Kotlin tests with Fixture Monkey — enumerate the cases a method can produce, pick the ones worth testing, and build each fixture pinning only the properties that force the expected outcome.
dogfood
Dogfood pmat — rebuild, install, exercise every CLI command against pmat's own repo, check output integrity + self-quality, find next work. Read-only audit; files issues for bugs.
review-core-correctness
Normative mandatory reviewer for correctness, contracts, architecture sanity, UX behavior, code quality and tests in the explyt spring-plugin codebase. Use during orchestrated code review of a PR, diff, commit or branch, or when asked to review correctness, logic, architecture or test coverage of plugin changes.
coding-guard
Compact coding guidelines for the explyt/spring-plugin repository - covers process rules (think first, simplicity, surgical changes), module layout, IntelliJ Platform threading and PSI rules, inspection and test conventions, message bundles, statistics tracking, and PR hygiene. You must call this skill before any code…
review-statistic-coverage
Usage-statistics coverage check for explyt/spring-plugin code reviews — verify that new user-visible features (quick fixes, intentions, gutter actions, completions, actions, tool-window controls, wizard steps) register usage via StatisticService and StatisticActionId. Use when reviewing a diff or PR that adds or…