Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add woliveiras/geremmyas --skill bugfixgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/woliveiras/geremmyasWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/woliveiras/geremmyas/bugfix)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/woliveiras/geremmyas/bugfix"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/woliveiras/geremmyas/bugfix/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/woliveiras/geremmyas/bugfix"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/woliveiras/geremmyas/bugfix.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00041 | $0.00918 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00016 | $0.00367 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00184 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00092 |
Grade A, and why
bugfix scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 98 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Bugfix
Fix bugs by building evidence before changing code. Use the bundled regression testing reference when converting the reproduction into a durable test.
Document Location
Save bugfix documents under:
docs/bugfixes/YYYY-MM-DD-<bug-slug>.md
Use the local date when the investigation starts. The slug must be lowercase kebab-case, based on the user-visible symptom or failing capability, for example:
docs/bugfixes/2026-05-21-login-redirect-loop.md
If a relevant bugfix document already exists, update it instead of creating a duplicate. If the bug has an issue, ticket, or PR reference, put that reference inside the document, not in the filename.
For outages, save the postmortem separately under:
docs/postmortems/YYYY-MM-DD-<incident-slug>.md
Process
- Create or update a bugfix document with:
- symptom
- impact
- reproduction steps
- expected behavior
- actual behavior
- outage status When creating one, use the focused bugfix document template.
- Build a reproduction loop before changing production code. Prefer a failing test, then an HTTP/CLI/browser script, then a small harness.
- Confirm the loop reproduces the user's bug, not a nearby failure.
- Write 3-5 ranked hypotheses. Each hypothesis must predict what evidence would confirm or falsify it.
- Instrument only the boundary needed to test the current hypothesis. Tag any temporary logs clearly so they can be removed.
- Convert the minimized reproduction into a regression test at the correct seam (mandatory before applying the fix).
- Run the regression test and record its expected failure before changing production code. A test that starts green is not regression evidence; correct the seam or reproduction first.
- Apply the smallest change that addresses the highest-ranked hypothesis supported by evidence.
- Rerun the regression test, original reproduction loop, and nearest relevant suite. If evidence falsifies the hypothesis, update the document, rank the remaining hypotheses, and start another evidence-driven cycle.
- Remove temporary instrumentation, record the actual cause and why the fix addresses it, and capture any residual evidence that could not be automated or run locally.
- Escalate only when the requested objective must materially expand, production or external authority is required, or the same blocker remains after three consecutive evidence-driven cycles. Otherwise continue autonomously.
- If the bug was an outage, write a postmortem. Otherwise complete the workflow with the updated bugfix document and regression test as its durable audit trail.
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 98 lines · 41 tokens per session scan A 8bd7448a9ccf
bugfix is a skill published in the GitHub repository woliveiras/geremmyas (10 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 41 tokens to every session and 918 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
bugfix compared with skills from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| bugfixwoliveiras/geremmyas | Skill | 10 | 3mo ago | MIT | A | 41 | Claude Code, Codex |
| systematic-debuggingopen-metadata/OpenMetadata | Skill | 16k | yesterday | Apache-2.0 | A | 37 | Claude Code |
| log-error-digestzebbern/claude-code-guide | Skill | 4.7k | 3d ago | MIT | A | 71 | Claude Code, Codex |
| cwv-optimizeradobe/skills | Skill | 319 | yesterday | Apache-2.0 | A | 112 | Claude Code |
| ci-fixersipyourdrink-ltd/bernstein | Skill | 1.2k | yesterday | Apache-2.0 | A | 15 | Claude Code, Codex |
| incident-response-incident-responsermyndharis/antigravity-skills | Skill | 1.9k | 23d ago | MIT | A | 36 | Claude Code |
| triaging-web-analytics-supportPostHog/posthog | Skill | 41k | yesterday | none | A | 151 | Claude Code, Codex |