Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add woliveiras/geremmyas --skill ci-workflowgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/woliveiras/geremmyasWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/woliveiras/geremmyas/ci-workflow)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/woliveiras/geremmyas/ci-workflow"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/woliveiras/geremmyas/ci-workflow/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/woliveiras/geremmyas/ci-workflow"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/woliveiras/geremmyas/ci-workflow.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00046 | $0.00309 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00018 | $0.00124 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00062 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00031 |
Grade A, and why
ci-workflow scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
CI Workflow
Build CI/CD workflows that are reliable, scoped, and safe with untrusted input.
Process
- Identify the workflow goal: test, lint, build, preview, release, deploy, or maintenance.
- Inspect existing workflow conventions, scripts, package managers, and required secrets.
- Define triggers and concurrency before adding jobs.
- Set minimal workflow and job permissions.
- Add jobs in dependency order with small shell steps or reusable scripts.
- Configure cache only for safe package-manager or build caches.
- Use OIDC for cloud deploys when available.
- Add artifact upload only for intentional outputs with explicit retention.
- Verify with local syntax review and the relevant CI result or log.
Rules
- Treat event payload text as untrusted input.
- Do not expose secrets in logs, command-line flags, artifacts, or PR comments.
- Pin third-party actions to a commit SHA for sensitive workflows.
- Do not grant broad
write-allpermissions. - Keep deploy and release workflows protected with environment approvals or equivalent human gates.
Output
- Workflow purpose and trigger summary
- Permission and secret rationale
- Cache/artifact choices
- Verification result or failing CI evidence
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 40 lines · 46 tokens per session scan A 081074c9003f
ci-workflow is a skill published in the GitHub repository woliveiras/geremmyas (10 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 46 tokens to every session and 309 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
ci-workflow compared with skills from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ci-workflowwoliveiras/geremmyas | Skill | 10 | 3mo ago | MIT | A | 46 | Claude Code, Codex |
| chinese-git-workflowjnMetaCode/superpowers-zh | Skill | 8.5k | 11d ago | MIT | A | 69 | Claude Code |
| atmos-profilescloudposse/atmos | Skill | 1.4k | yesterday | Apache-2.0 | A | 35 | Claude Code |
| webhook-managementhoangsonww/Claude-Code-Agent-Monitor | Skill | 1.1k | yesterday | MIT | A | 56 | Claude Code, Codex |
| monorepo-managementwshobson/agents | Skill | 42k | yesterday | MIT | C | 54 | Claude Code |
| managing-github-actions-secretsPostHog/posthog-foss | Skill | 728 | yesterday | MIT | A | 67 | Claude Code, Codex |
| postman-newman-automationLambdaTest/agent-skills | Skill | 390 | yesterday | MIT | A | 156 | Claude Code, Codex |