Getting it into your agent
It runs from inside its repository, so the clone comes first — what it calls does not travel with the file alone.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Wondermonger-daydreaming/claude-skills-librarynpx agentmods add skills/wondermonger-daydreaming/claude-skills-library/scholar-evaluationWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/wondermonger-daydreaming/claude-skills-library/scholar-evaluation)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/wondermonger-daydreaming/claude-skills-library/scholar-evaluation"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/wondermonger-daydreaming/claude-skills-library/scholar-evaluation/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/wondermonger-daydreaming/claude-skills-library/scholar-evaluation"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/wondermonger-daydreaming/claude-skills-library/scholar-evaluation.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00027 | $0.02350 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00014 | $0.01175 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00470 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00235 |
Grade A, and why
scholar-evaluation scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
86% identical to scholar-evaluation — 6 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 295 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Scholar Evaluation
Overview
Apply the ScholarEval framework to systematically evaluate scholarly and research work. This skill provides structured evaluation methodology based on peer-reviewed research assessment criteria, enabling comprehensive analysis of academic papers, research proposals, literature reviews, and scholarly writing across multiple quality dimensions.
When to Use This Skill
Use this skill when:
- Evaluating research papers for quality and rigor
- Assessing literature review comprehensiveness and quality
- Reviewing research methodology design
- Scoring data analysis approaches
- Evaluating scholarly writing and presentation
- Providing structured feedback on academic work
- Benchmarking research quality against established criteria
- Assessing publication readiness for target venues
- Providing quantitative evaluation to complement qualitative peer review
Visual Enhancement with Scientific Schematics
When creating documents with this skill, always consider adding scientific diagrams and schematics to enhance visual communication.
If your document does not already contain schematics or diagrams:
- Use the scientific-schematics skill to generate AI-powered publication-quality diagrams
- Simply describe your desired diagram in natural language
- Nano Banana Pro will automatically generate, review, and refine the schematic
For new documents: Scientific schematics should be generated by default to visually represent key concepts, workflows, architectures, or relationships described in the text.
How to generate schematics:
python scripts/generate_schematic.py "your diagram description" -o figures/output.png
The AI will automatically:
- Create publication-quality images with proper formatting
- Review and refine through multiple iterations
- Ensure accessibility (colorblind-friendly, high contrast)
- Save outputs in the figures/ directory
When to add schematics:
- Evaluation framework diagrams
- Quality assessment criteria decision trees
- Scholarly workflow visualizations
- Assessment methodology flowcharts
- Scoring rubric visualizations
- Evaluation process diagrams
- Any complex concept that benefits from visualization
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 295 lines · 27 tokens per session scan A 8313b4d992a4
scholar-evaluation is a skill published in the GitHub repository Wondermonger-daydreaming/claude-skills-library (6 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 27 tokens to every session and 2,350 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 86% identical to scholar-evaluation, differing in 6 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
alterlab-rma-statistics-guide
This skill should be used when the user asks about "statistics", "statistical analysis", "SPSS", "R statistics", "hypothesis testing", "t-test", "ANOVA", "chi-square", "regression analysis", "correlation", "p-value", "effect size", "confidence interval", "descriptive statistics", "inferential statistics", "data…
04_data_intelligence
You are the Data Intelligence Specialist — the final authority on statistical rigor, figure excellence, and results architecture. You ensure that every number reported is correct, every figure communicates instantly, and every results paragraph follows a logical structure that reviewers cannot dismantle.
Claude
Author: Dr. Aneesh Joseph Implementation: Claude (Anthropic) Version: 2.2 | December 2025.
onekgpd
Query the 1000 Genomes Project dataset (3,202 whole-genome-sequenced individuals, GRCh38) at the level of individual participants. Use when a question is about individuals or variants in the 1000 Genomes Project cohort: which individuals carry variants matching specific criteria in a gene or region, which individuals…
pkpd-modeling
Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic modelling and simulation - non-compartmental analysis, compartmental and population PK, PK/PD and exposure-response, TMDD, PBPK orientation, bioequivalence, allometric scaling and first-in-human dose, drug interaction prediction, and Bayesian therapeutic drug monitoring. Use when…
biopython
Comprehensive molecular biology toolkit. Use for sequence manipulation, file parsing (FASTA/GenBank/PDB), phylogenetics, and programmatic NCBI/PubMed access (Bio.Entrez). Best for batch processing, custom bioinformatics pipelines, BLAST automation. For quick lookups use gget; for multi-service integration use…