Agentic Plugin Marketplace is a collection of reusable plugins, agents, skills, commands, and rules for coding-agent tools including Claude Code, Codex CLI, Cursor, OpenCode, Antigravity CLI, and GitHub Copilot. It is for developers assembling agentic workflows across multiple harnesses from shared Markdown sources, and the catalogue entries are examples or subsets of those workflow components.
Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add wshobson/agents --skill linkerd-patternsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/wshobson/agentsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/wshobson/agents/linkerd-patterns)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/wshobson/agents/linkerd-patterns"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/wshobson/agents/linkerd-patterns/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/wshobson/agents/linkerd-patterns"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/wshobson/agents/linkerd-patterns.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- Socket pass
- Snyk pass
- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 2 findings, up to high
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- high Supply Chain · line 58 Remote code is downloaded and executed. This bypasses code review and could introduce malicious code.Fix: Avoid downloading and executing remote scripts. Use trusted packages from PyPI/npm. If remote fetch is required, verify checksums and use HTTPS.
- high Tool Misuse · line 58 Tool calls are chained to bypass individual safety checks or escalate capabilities beyond what any single tool call would allow.Fix: Limit tool chaining depth and validate the output of each tool before passing it to the next. Require explicit user approval for multi-step chains.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00041 | $0.01888 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00016 | $0.00755 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00378 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00189 |
Grade A, and why
linkerd-patterns scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 16d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
6 near-identical copies found in the catalogue:
- linkerd-patterns — 100% identical, 8 lines differ
- linkerd-patterns — 86% identical, 45 lines differ
- linkerd-patterns — 84% identical, 32 lines differ
- linkerd-patterns — 84% identical, 19 lines differ
- linkerd-patterns — 84% identical, 14 lines differ
- linkerd-patterns — 84% identical, 14 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 310 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Linkerd Patterns
Production patterns for Linkerd service mesh - the lightweight, security-first service mesh for Kubernetes.
When to Use This Skill
- Setting up a lightweight service mesh
- Implementing automatic mTLS
- Configuring traffic splits for canary deployments
- Setting up service profiles for per-route metrics
- Implementing retries and timeouts
- Multi-cluster service mesh
Core Concepts
1. Linkerd Architecture
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Control Plane │
│ ┌─────────┐ ┌──────────┐ ┌──────────────┐ │
│ │ destiny │ │ identity │ │ proxy-inject │ │
│ └─────────┘ └──────────┘ └──────────────┘ │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────┘
│
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Data Plane │
│ ┌─────┐ ┌─────┐ ┌─────┐ │
│ │proxy│────│proxy│────│proxy│ │
│ └─────┘ └─────┘ └─────┘ │
│ │ │ │ │
│ ┌──┴──┐ ┌──┴──┐ ┌──┴──┐ │
│ │ app │ │ app │ │ app │ │
│ └─────┘ └─────┘ └─────┘ │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────┘
2. Key Resources
| Resource | Purpose |
|---|---|
| ServiceProfile | Per-route metrics, retries, timeouts |
| TrafficSplit | Canary deployments, A/B testing |
| Server | Define server-side policies |
| ServerAuthorization | Access control policies |
Templates
Template 1: Mesh Installation
Use a CLI version compatible with the target cluster. The example uses Homebrew; for other systems, follow the official installation guide.
# Install the CLI with Homebrew
brew install linkerd
linkerd version
# Validate cluster
linkerd check --pre
# Install CRDs
linkerd install --crds | kubectl apply -f -
# Install control plane
linkerd install | kubectl apply -f -
# Verify installation
linkerd check
# Install viz extension (optional)
linkerd viz install | kubectl apply -f -
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 16d ago Changed · +4 lines scan B → A a025d94e1538
- 1mo ago First seen · 306 lines · 41 tokens per session scan B 40a8e4835699
linkerd-patterns is a skill published in the GitHub repository wshobson/agents (41,247 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 41 tokens to every session and 1,888 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
relay-deploy
Set up a complete deployment configuration — Dockerfile, deployment manifest, environment config, and rollback procedure. Use when asked about "deployment setup", "how do I deploy this", "deployment strategy", or "rollback plan".
forge-cost
Audit cloud infrastructure costs and produce a concrete optimization plan with specific changes and estimated savings. Use when asked to "how much is this costing", "reduce cloud spend", "cost optimization", "are we overpaying", "cloud bill", or "budget for this infra".
forge-infra
Build production-grade infrastructure as code for a service or project. Use when asked to "set up infra", "provision infrastructure", "create cloud resources", "IaC for this project", "terraform for this", or "deploy this service".
forge-recon
Infrastructure reconnaissance — inventory all cloud resources, map connections, flag risks. Use when asked to "inventory our infra", "what infrastructure do we have", "map our cloud resources", "infra discovery", or "what's running in our cloud".
flux-recon
Database reconnaissance — full inventory of schema, migrations, data volume, backups, connection pooling, and query patterns. Use when asked to "assess this database", "understand the schema", or "database health check".
forge-audit
Audit existing infrastructure for security issues, waste, and misconfigurations. Use when asked to "audit my infra", "check cloud setup", "infra review", "are we wasting money", "security check on infra", or "review my terraform".