Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add xcodethink/open-claude-code-skills --skill 05git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/xcodethink/open-claude-code-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/xcodethink/open-claude-code-skills/05)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/xcodethink/open-claude-code-skills/05"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/xcodethink/open-claude-code-skills/05/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/xcodethink/open-claude-code-skills/05"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/xcodethink/open-claude-code-skills/05.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00178 | $0.00459 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00071 | $0.00184 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00036 | $0.00092 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00018 | $0.00046 |
Grade A, and why
05-开发协作 scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
开发协作规范
三种模式
| 模式 | 角色数 | 适合场景 | 命令 |
|---|---|---|---|
| solo | 1 | 改bug、写脚本、小调整 | ./runner.sh solo "需求" |
| team | 3 | 功能模块、中等页面 | ./runner.sh team "需求" |
| full | 7 | 完整产品、要上线的项目 | ./runner.sh full "需求" |
runner.sh 放在本目录。使用时复制到项目根目录运行。
详细说明：
单角色开发流程.md多角色协同流程.md验收标准.md决策记录规范.mdGit工作流和仓库体系.md（分支策略、三仓库体系、立项流程）沟通和文档规范.md（沟通规则、文档同步、错误分级）Subagent使用规范.md（Claude Code 内置 Task/Subagent 工具的使用策略）Agent SDK编排规范.md（产品代码中的多 Agent 协作：Pipeline/Fan-out/Router/Supervisor 模式、Tool 注册、Model 选择、Agent Teams）
What ships with it
13 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 27 lines · 178 tokens per session scan A 8bb2da14e1ad
05-开发协作 is a skill published in the GitHub repository xcodethink/open-claude-code-skills (2 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 178 tokens to every session and 459 once invoked, about $0.0007 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
flutter-idioms
Flutter idioms: Riverpod 3 state management, Freezed immutable models, gorouter navigation, const widget optimization, and repository patterns. Use when developing, refactoring, or reviewing Flutter mobile applications.
go-idioms
Go idioms and patterns: stdlib conventions, explicit error wrapping (%w), small interfaces, goroutines/channels concurrency, table-driven tests, and gofumpt formatting. Use when writing, refactoring, or reviewing Go services and packages.
rust-idioms
Rust idioms: ownership and borrow checker patterns, error handling with thiserror/anyhow, Tokio async concurrency, lifetime management, and Clippy pedantic compliance. Use when writing, optimizing, or reviewing Rust crates.
typescript-idioms
TypeScript strict typing: type narrowing, discriminated unions, Zod runtime validation, generic utility types, and Vitest testing. Use when writing or refactoring TypeScript across frontend, backend, or full-stack projects.
vue-idioms
Vue 3 Composition API patterns: syntax, reactive state with Pinia stores, reusable composables, and Vitest component testing. Use when developing or refactoring Vue 3 frontend applications.
axum-idioms
Axum (0.8+) web framework patterns: type-safe extractors, Tower middleware, route routing, and graceful shutdown. Use when implementing HTTP APIs or web services in Rust. Pair with rust-idioms.